@dongxi_nlp: Dario is calling on Frontier to slow down its development pace, and hopes that through regulation, "enterprises that ar…
Summary
Dario Amodei calls on the AI industry to slow development and advocates for regulation, with Anthropic committing to third-party evaluator access.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/13/26, 12:59 AM
Dario is calling on Frontier to slow down its development pace, and hopes that through regulation, “enterprises that are unwilling to participate voluntarily will also be brought under constraints.” ???
Dario Amodei (@DarioAmodei): We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.
Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our
Similar Articles
Dario's new plan: Govt should give frontier labs a narrow antitrust waiver to slow down AI development.
Dario Amodei proposes that governments should grant frontier AI labs a narrow antitrust waiver to slow down AI development.
Anthropic boss Dario Amodei calls for AI development to slow down
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei urges slowing AI development to address safety risks, proposing independent monitoring and regulation, with reactions from industry figures like Sam Altman and Elon Musk.
Dario Amodei and other AI leaders want to ‘Pace the Frontier’ but…how?
Dario Amodei and other AI leaders propose pacing AI development through safety evaluations and coordination, sparking industry debate and support from companies like OpenAI and Google.
@0xLogicrw: At the All-In Summit, Jensen Huang opposed Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s proposal to slow down the development of fronti…
At the All-In Summit, Jensen Huang and Dario Amodei agreed on allowing third-party safety assessments for frontier AI labs, while opposing slowing development, with Trump calling in to dismiss AI doomsday theories.
Dario Amodei on regulation and the messaging around AI (5 minute read)
Dario Amodei argues that AI regulation can be structured to decentralize power, address risks, and advantage smaller competitors by differentially constraining frontier models.