CRM-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents in Stateful Enterprise Environments

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

该论文提出 CRM-Agent-Bench,一个基于执行的基准,包含 555 个有状态多轮任务,用于通过严格的契约检查评估工具使用型语言代理在九个企业业务领域中的结果、轨迹、可运行性与合规性;在十六个系统上评测中严格成功率介于 64.32% 到 83.60% 之间。

Deploying language agents in real applications demands more than the right answer: an agent must execute a multi-step business process correctly, follow domain-specific rules, and interact with a user across a dialogue, where the gap between saying and doing is the gap between a satisfied customer and a real loss. We argue that a deployable-agent benchmark should jointly assess four facets: the outcome an agent reaches, the trajectory it takes, its operational viability, and its policy compliance. Customer relationship management (CRM), where mutable records meet operational rules and consequential effects, exercises all four. We introduce CRM-Agent-Bench, an execution-grounded benchmark of 555 stateful, multi-turn tasks across nine business domains and 36 capability tags. Each task supplies a task-specific executable contract drawn from checks over actions, arguments, order, response, target state, and protected state; success is the strict conjunction of the checks declared for that task. We evaluate the complete agent system through these contracts and report scored coverage, latency, and cost. Across sixteen systems evaluated on the audited final release, strict success spans 64.32% to 83.60%; the closely grouped leading systems nonetheless diverge sharply in cost and per-domain reliability. CRM-Agent-Bench offers an auditable framework for measuring contract-grounded business-transaction integrity and adherence to task-declared benchmark policies, with a portable structure designed for extension as models improve. Github repository: https://github.com/salesforce-misc/crm-agent-bench
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/28/26, 01:54 AM

Paper page - CRM-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents in Stateful Enterprise Environments

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.32004

Abstract

The study introduces an execution-grounded benchmark for evaluating deployable language agents on multi-turn business tasks using strict contract-based success criteria across outcome, trajectory, viability, and compliance.

Deployinglanguage agentsin real applications demands more than the right answer: an agent must execute a multi-step business process correctly, follow domain-specific rules, and interact with a user across a dialogue, where the gap between saying and doing is the gap between a satisfied customer and a real loss. We argue that a deployable-agent benchmark should jointly assess four facets: the outcome an agent reaches, the trajectory it takes, itsoperational viability, and itspolicy compliance. Customer relationship management (CRM), where mutable records meet operational rules and consequential effects, exercises all four. We introduceCRM-Agent-Bench, an execution-grounded benchmark of 555 stateful, multi-turn tasks across nine business domains and 36 capability tags. Each task supplies a task-specific executable contract drawn from checks over actions, arguments, order, response, target state, and protected state; success is the strict conjunction of the checks declared for that task. We evaluate the complete agent system through these contracts and report scored coverage, latency, and cost. Across sixteen systems evaluated on the audited final release, strict success spans 64.32% to 83.60%; the closely grouped leading systems nonetheless diverge sharply in cost and per-domain reliability.CRM-Agent-Benchoffers an auditable framework for measuring contract-grounded business-transaction integrity and adherence to task-declared benchmark policies, with a portable structure designed for extension as models improve. Github repository: https://github.com/salesforce-misc/crm-agent-bench

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub2Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610\.32004

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.32004 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.32004 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.32004 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

ThinkingBox: Solving an agent task once vs. solving it 20/20: 507 stateful workflows graded on terminal database state [R]

Reddit r/MachineLearning

微软发布 ThinkingBox-Bench,包含 507 个状态化企业工作流任务,每个任务独立运行 20 次并以终端数据库状态评分,揭示 pass@20 与 all-20 排名几乎完全相反,且 67% 的失败轨迹在完成式代理下会被误判为成功。研究显示发现能力与可重复性对模型的排名差异巨大,Kimi-K3 覆盖最广但重复率低,Claude Opus 5 重复稳定性更高。

AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Introduces AgenticDataBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLM-based data agents across diverse domains with fine-grained skill-based metrics, including real-world B2B use cases and synthetic tasks.