Claw-Anything: Benchmarking Always-On Personal Assistants with Broader Access to User's Digital World
Summary
Introduces Claw-Anything, a benchmark that evaluates always-on personal AI assistants on comprehensive user activity contexts spanning extended timeframes, multiple services, and diverse device interactions. Experiments show that even GPT-5.5 achieves only 34.5% pass@1, highlighting a significant gap between current agent capabilities and the demands of always-on assistance.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/26/26, 06:43 AM
Paper page - Claw-Anything: Benchmarking Always-On Personal Assistants with Broader Access to User’s Digital World
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.26086 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Claw-Anything benchmark evaluates large language model agents on comprehensive user activity contexts spanning extended timeframes, multiple services, and diverse device interactions to assess true always-on personal assistance capabilities.
Large language model agentsare increasingly envisioned as always-onpersonal assistantswith access to anything relevant in the user’s digital world. Yet current systems operate over only narrow slices of that world, limiting context-sensitive reasoning and effective assistance. Existing benchmarks similarly provide only partial user state and therefore fail to capture performance in such a broad, always-on setting. To address this gap, we introduce Claw-Anything, a benchmark that expands agent context along three dimensions: long-horizon activity histories, interdependent backend services, and integrated GUI and CLI interaction across multiple devices. To instantiate this setting, we simulate months ofuser activitythroughmulti-round event injection, producing complex world states and realistic noise, including irrelevant events and conflicting signals. Agents must reason over rich contextual environments while remaining robust to such noise. This expanded scope also enables the evaluation ofproactive assistance, requiring agents to anticipate user needs and deliver timely recommendations. Experiments show that GPT-5.5 achieves only 34.5%pass@1, substantially below prior benchmarks, underscoring a gap between current agent capabilities and the demands of always-on personal assistance. Alongside the benchmark, we release anautomated data-generation pipelinethat yields 2,000 training environments and improves the base model by 23.7%, demonstrating its utility of scalable data infrastructure.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub4Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605\.26086
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.26086 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper1
#### LiberCoders/Claw-Anything Viewer• Updated4 minutes ago • 2.22k • 2
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.26086 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Microsoft launches Scout, an OpenClaw-inspired personal assistant
Microsoft launches Scout, an AI assistant built on the OpenClaw framework, designed as an always-on agentic assistant integrated into Microsoft 365 with persistent memory, customizable skills, and security protections.
ClawBench: Can AI agents complete everyday online tasks?
ClawBench is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on everyday online tasks. This V2 update brings improvements or new tasks.
Local-first personal AI assistant (Telegram) (looking for feature ideas)
The author is building ClawLite, an open-source local-first personal AI assistant that runs on your machine via Ollama and interacts through Telegram. It features multi-agent research with source cross-checking, hierarchical memory with Markdown export, fail-closed governance, and a lightweight Windows installer, and the author is seeking feature ideas from the community.
the agentic depth gap between open source AI assistants ranked
This article ranks three open source AI assistants—OpenClaw, Vellum, and Hermes—on agentic depth, measuring how far they can autonomously execute tasks before human intervention. It highlights trade-offs between raw capability, configuration complexity, and reliability across long sequences.
MyPCBench: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Computer-Use Agents
MyPCBench evaluates computer-use agents as personal assistants in a simulated Linux desktop environment with real-world web applications, revealing that Claude Opus 4.6 achieves the highest task completion rate of 55.4% while struggling with multi-application tasks and long trajectories.