Where does your RAG pipeline actually fail, retrieval or generation?
Summary
The article discusses the challenge of distinguishing between retrieval and generation failures in RAG systems and explores practical methods to measure each component independently.
Similar Articles
Most RAG apps in production are confidently wrong and nobody talks about this enough
The article highlights a critical failure mode in production RAG systems where confident but incorrect answers arise from versioning issues and lack of uncertainty mechanisms. It proposes architectural improvements like routing layers, retrieval scoring, and hallucination checks to mitigate these errors.
Why Retrieval-Augmented Generation Fails: A Graph Perspective
This paper investigates why Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems fail despite having access to correct evidence. Using circuit tracing and attribution graphs, the authors find that correct predictions exhibit deeper reasoning paths and more distributed evidence flow, while failures show shallow and fragmented patterns. They propose a graph-based error detection framework and targeted interventions to improve RAG reliability.
When Failures Propagate: Causal Failure Attribution in Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation
The paper introduces AgenticRAG-FP, an interventional benchmark for causal failure attribution in agentic RAG systems, analyzing how failures propagate across retrieval hops and evaluating diagnosis performance.
Wrote up the failure modes that kept breaking my RAG system: chunking, stale index, hybrid search, the works
A developer shares the failure modes encountered while debugging a RAG system, including issues with chunking, stale indices, and hybrid search, along with practical fixes like sliding window chunking and contextual retrieval.
Where Does Retrieval Fail? Evaluating RAG Architectures for Agricultural Advisory
This paper evaluates retrieval quality in RAG systems for Bengali agricultural advisory, finding performance varies by query type and language conditions, and introduces a benchmark dataset to highlight the need for disaggregated evaluation in low-resource settings.