Kept seeing complaints about memory benchmarks, so I built one. Glasshouse v0.1 is out

I've posted here a few times about the memory benchmark I've been building. It started because going through dev communities, I kept seeing people raise the same problems with memory benchmarks: the numbers a vendor publishes don't match what someone else measures, and swapping the model that grades the answers moves the results more than the gap between the systems being compared. Last time the repo only had the rules and structure in it, not the actual benchmark. That's changed. Glasshouse v0.1 is up now with the real files in it, link in the comments. Quick version for anyone who hasn't seen the earlier posts: 2,847 questions over a conversation that runs to 1.97 million tokens, in 10 languages, with 50 photos. The conversation comes in four sizes, from 1,882 turns to 103,572, and the part that holds the answers is identical in all of them, so where the score falls apart tells you whether a system holds up as the history piles up. Every axis is reported on its own and there's no single headline number, because a system can be great at one and useless at another. It also goes past plain recall. If a fact changed and the system can't find the new value, "I don't know" scores better than confidently giving the old one. If two stored facts disagree and nothing settles it, saying they don't agree is the right answer. If something was never said, it checks whether the system says so. A few of those came straight from people on this sub, and they're credited by name in the repo along with what each suggestion turned into. Submissions are still empty and we haven't submitted anything ourselves either, so this is where I could use help. If you run it and something looks off, open a PR or an issue, there's no threshold for individuals. And if you're at a company and want to submit a result or get listed, how that works is in the repo.