@_stakaya: A survey (citing Figure 1) that organizes the core capability of "memory" in AI agents from three perspectives: forms, …

X AI KOLs Timeline Papers

Summary

A survey that organizes the core capability of 'memory' in AI agents from three perspectives: forms, functions, and dynamics, linked to the arXiv paper 'Memory in the Age of AI Agents'.

A survey (citing Figure 1) that organizes the core capability of "memory" in AI agents from three perspectives: forms, functions, and dynamics. The word "memory" tends to have meanings that vary from person to person and can get messy, so this is very helpful. Memory in the Age of AI Agents https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13564
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/29/26, 02:28 PM

A survey (citing Figure 1) that organizes the core capability of “memory” in AI agents from three perspectives: forms, functions, and dynamics. The word “memory” tends to have meanings that vary from person to person and can get messy, so this is very helpful. Memory in the Age of AI Agents https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13564


Memory in the Age of AI Agents

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13564 Authors:Yuyang Hu,Shichun Liu,Yanwei Yue,Guibin Zhang,Boyang Liu,Fangyi Zhu,Jiahang Lin,Honglin Guo,Shihan Dou,Zhiheng Xi,Senjie Jin,Jiejun Tan,Yanbin Yin,Jiongnan Liu,Zeyu Zhang,Zhongxiang Sun,Yutao Zhu,Hao Sun,Boci Peng,Zhenrong Cheng,Xuanbo Fan,Jiaxin Guo,Xinlei Yu,Zhenhong Zhou,Zewen Hu,Jiahao Huo,Junhao Wang,Yuwei Niu,Yu Wang,Zhenfei Yin,Xiaobin Hu,Yue Liao,Qiankun Li,Kun Wang,Wangchunshu Zhou,Yixin Liu,Dawei Cheng,Qi Zhang,Tao Gui,Shirui Pan,Yan Zhang,Philip Torr,Zhicheng Dou,Ji-Rong Wen,Xuanjing Huang,Yu-Gang Jiang,Shuicheng Yan

View PDF

Abstract:Memory has emerged, and will continue to remain, a core capability of foundation model-based agents. As research on agent memory rapidly expands and attracts unprecedented attention, the field has also become increasingly fragmented. Existing works that fall under the umbrella of agent memory often differ substantially in their motivations, implementations, and evaluation protocols, while the proliferation of loosely defined memory terminologies has further obscured conceptual clarity. Traditional taxonomies such as long/short-term memory have proven insufficient to capture the diversity of contemporary agent memory systems. This work aims to provide an up-to-date landscape of current agent memory research. We begin by clearly delineating the scope of agent memory and distinguishing it from related concepts such as LLM memory, retrieval augmented generation (RAG), and context engineering. We then examine agent memory through the unified lenses of forms, functions, and dynamics. From the perspective of forms, we identify three dominant realizations of agent memory, namely token-level, parametric, and latent memory. From the perspective of functions, we propose a finer-grained taxonomy that distinguishes factual, experiential, and working memory. From the perspective of dynamics, we analyze how memory is formed, evolved, and retrieved over time. To support practical development, we compile a comprehensive summary of memory benchmarks and open-source frameworks. Beyond consolidation, we articulate a forward-looking perspective on emerging research frontiers, including memory automation, reinforcement learning integration, multimodal memory, multi-agent memory, and trustworthiness issues. We hope this survey serves not only as a reference for existing work, but also as a conceptual foundation for rethinking memory as a first-class primitive in the design of future agentic intelligence.

Submission history

From: Guibin Zhang [view email] **[v1]**Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:22:34 UTC (28,501 KB) **[v2]**Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:33:57 UTC (28,509 KB)

Similar Articles

Agent Memory: An Anatomy

Hacker News Top

An exploration of the components and design decisions behind agent memory libraries, clarifying the gap between cognitive science terminology and engineering implementation.