We quantized Qwen 3.8 27B and compared the quants on an RTX 6000
Summary
The team quantized Qwen 3.8 27B into various GGUF formats and benchmarked them on an RTX 6000, finding similar performance across quants with AD-Q6_K recommended for safety.
Similar Articles
Qwen 3.6 35B GGUF: NTP vs MTP quantization results across GPUs and CPUs
ByteShape releases Qwen 3.6 35B GGUF quantizations in NTP and MTP variants with detailed benchmarking across multiple GPUs and CPUs, finding that larger quants often outperform smaller ones and MTP provides GPU speed boosts at the cost of memory.
I compared GGUF quants of Qwen3.6 27B to NVFP4, AWQ, AutoRound, and FP8
A detailed benchmark comparing 16 quantizations of Qwen3.6 27B across GGUF, NVFP4, AWQ, AutoRound, and FP8 formats, measuring KL divergence from the unquantized reference. Weight-only GGUF quants generally offer the best quality-size tradeoffs, while vLLM quants vary substantially.
Qwen 3.8 27B at ~3 BPW on an RTX 3060: GSQ vs ByteShape IQ3-XXS 2.88BPW
The article compares GSQ and ByteShape quantizations of the Qwen 3.8 27B model on an RTX 3060, revealing that ByteShape's quant underperformed despite claims of high similarity to the original model.
Qwen3.6 27B Pure Quant: 40 tok/s on 16 GB VRAM
A quantized version of Qwen3.6 27B using a pure Q4_K_M method fits entirely in 16 GB VRAM, achieving up to 40 tok/s token generation speed with MTP, and significantly reducing model size compared to other GGUF variants.
I want to try qwen 3.8... but which gguf are we all using?
A user discusses the challenge of selecting the appropriate GGUF quantization variant for the Qwen 3.8 AI model to achieve good performance with 32 GB of VRAM, seeking community recommendations.