@YRSM_Simon: After Opus 5.5 was released, I switched back from Codex again. Paying the subscription fee, keeping the memory stored, …
Summary
A user discusses switching back to Opus 5.5 after using Codex, praising the product's memory and multi-platform features while commenting on the lack of user stickiness.
Similar Articles
@svpino: It's been a couple of weeks since I migrated from Claude Code to Codex, and I don't miss a single thing. No, I don't ca…
The author describes their experience migrating from Claude Code to Codex, claiming that Anthropic's products have no stickiness and can be easily replaced.
@omarsar0: Opus 5.5 feels more like Opus 4.5. Is it just me, or did it get a lot better at writing? Claudese feels like it's mostl…
A user observes that Opus 5.5 feels improved over Opus 4.5 in writing quality and reduces 'Claudese,' making responses easier to consume.
@reach_vb: Welcome! Posts like this make my day :) If you’ve moved over to Codex recently, what have been your favourite features …
A user shares their positive experience moving from Claude CLI to the Codex mac app, describing it as a joyful experience.
@addyosmani: Opus 5.5 is my new daily driver. Fable-level on most work, cheaper and faster than Opus 5 and Pro/Max/Team users just g…
Addy Osmani praises Opus 5.5 as a cheaper and faster AI model, declaring it his new daily driver for most work tasks.
My experience so far with Opus 5
A user shares their early experience with Opus 5, likely an AI model release.