The agent says "I sent the email." It never called send_email. Does this hit you too?
Summary
Discusses a common failure mode in AI agents where the model confidently claims to have performed an action (e.g., sending an email) without actually executing the required tool call, and asks the community how they detect and handle such silent failures in production.
Similar Articles
Anyone else finding that “agent said it succeeded” ≠ "it actually did the right thing"?
A practitioner asks about real-world experiences with AI agents reporting success while business outcomes are wrong, seeking operational feedback on manual checks and failure costs.
Why your agents "succeed" and then you find out three days later they didn't
Discusses the phenomenon where AI agents appear to succeed at tasks but later reveal failures, highlighting challenges in agent evaluation and monitoring.
AI agents fail in ways nobody writes about. Here's what I've actually seen.
The article highlights practical system-level failures in AI agent workflows, such as context bleed and hallucinated details, arguing that these are often infrastructure issues rather than model defects.
The agent failures that get you aren't crashes. They're clean runs that did the wrong thing.
The article discusses how AI agents often fail silently by completing tasks incorrectly without crashing, leading to undetected errors. It highlights common failure modes and explores potential detection strategies.
if your agent sends email, what sits between the agent and the actual send?
This article explores the mechanisms between an AI agent's decision to send an email and the actual SMTP call, focusing on rate-limiting, queuing, and domain checks in production environments to handle burst sending issues.