Exploring Academic Influence of Algorithms by Co-occurrence Network Based on Full-text of Academic Papers
Summary
This paper constructs large-scale algorithm co-occurrence networks from the full text of academic papers to study the collective influence of algorithms in NLP, finding that classic, high-performing, and intersectional algorithms hold central network positions.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/24/26, 07:44 AM
# Exploring Academic Influence of Algorithms by Co-occurrence Network Based on Full-text of Academic Papers Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24099](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24099) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.24099) > Abstract:Algorithms have become central to scientific research in the era of artificial intelligence \(AI\)\. Although algorithm mentions in papers are often used to indicate popularity and influence, existing studies usually evaluate individual algorithms in isolation and pay limited attention to the collective influence formed through their interconnections\. This study constructs large\-scale algorithm co\-occurrence networks in natural language processing \(NLP\) based on the full text of academic papers and investigates algorithm influence from a network perspective\. Using deep learning models, we extract algorithm entities and build overall, cumulative, and annual co\-occurrence networks\. We analyze their structural characteristics and apply multiple centrality measures to assess the group influence of algorithms across the whole field and over time\. The results show that algorithm networks display typical features of complex networks, with increasingly dense connections developing over approximately two decades\. Classic, high\-performing algorithms and those located at the intersections of different research periods tend to have high popularity, control, centrality, and balanced influence\. When the influence of an algorithm declines, it usually loses its core network position first, followed by weaker associations with other algorithms\. This study is the first large\-scale analysis of algorithm co\-occurrence networks\. Covering more than four decades of academic publications, it provides a temporal and structural view of algorithm influence and offers a foundation for future research on networks linking algorithms, scholars, and tasks\. ## Submission history From: Chengzhi Zhang \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/f4b4fabd/2606.24099)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 23 Jun 2026 03:26:39 UTC \(1,706 KB\)
Similar Articles
More Computational Resources Do Not Ensure Higher Scholarly Impact: Evidence from Leading NLP Conference Papers
This paper analyzes NLP conference papers from 2020 to 2025 to examine the relationship between reported GPU resources and scholarly impact, finding that while resources are associated with higher citations, they explain little of the variance in impact.
The Future of NLP may not be at NLP Conferences: Scholarly Migration Patterns in Natural Language Processing
A study analyzing 142K NLP papers from 2010–2026 finds that both established and new NLP authors are increasingly publishing in general ML venues like NeurIPS and ICLR rather than core NLP conferences like ACL, with a significant citation premium favoring ML venues.
@TheGlobalMinima: Do yourself a favour > go to http://paperswithcode.co > find “most cited” list of papers > read the top 10 papers > one…
Recommends reading the top most cited papers on Papers with Code, one or two per week, to deeply understand influential AI research.
A map of the latest 11 million papers split by semantic similarity and time slices [P]
A large-scale mapping of 11 million academic papers using semantic similarity and time-based slices, enabling analysis of research trends and connections.
Exploring the relationship between team institutional composition and novelty in academic papers based on fine-grained knowledge entities
This study examines how team institutional composition (academic, industrial, or mixed) affects the novelty of academic papers in NLP, using fine-grained knowledge entities like methods and datasets to measure novelty.