Moralitybench.ai: Updated with new models and moral choice (aka Trolley Problem) results
Summary
Moralitybench.ai has been updated with results from 20 AI models answering 56 standardized moral psychology questions five times each, including new Trolley Problem variants, plus two DIT-2 tests pending.
Similar Articles
MoralityBench.ai: Morality Leaderboard for AI
MoralityBench.ai is a new benchmark adapting moral psychology tests to evaluate AI models, finding that most models' moral answers show considerable variance across runs — suggesting morality is not deterministic in LLMs.
MoralityBench.ai: Open benchmark testing LLMs against validated human moral psychology instruments, updated results for Muse and Gemini 4 Argon
MoralityBench.ai 发布更新结果，使用经验证的人类道德心理量表对 16 个 LLM 配置各进行五轮 56 题测试，DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 平均偏离度最低（0.24），Llama 4 Maverick 答案一致性最高（93.9%），并新增 Muse Wonder、Gemini 4 Argon 和 GPT-6 Astra 的 10 月 14 日测试数据。
Position: Evaluations of AI Moral Reasoning Still Miss Half of the Picture
This paper critiques existing evaluations of AI moral reasoning for focusing on moral values while overlooking moral norms, and proposes a research agenda to develop standardized methods and datasets for assessing normative reasoning in large language models.
Someone tested various Models on the Political Compass test...
This article details experiments where various AI models were tested on the political compass test, with a focus on methodology, scoring validation, and results from multiple runs to ensure reproducibility.
Shouldn’t AI models be taught morality?
The article questions whether AI models should be taught morality during training, drawing parallels to human social upbringing to highlight the lack of ethical frameworks in current AI development.