NoisyCoconut: Counterfactual Consensus via Latent Space Reasoning
Summary
This paper introduces NoisyCoconut, an inference-time method that improves LLM reliability by injecting noise into latent trajectories to generate diverse reasoning paths. The approach enables models to abstain when uncertain, significantly reducing error rates in mathematical reasoning tasks without requiring retraining.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/12/26, 07:08 AM
# NoisyCoconut: Counterfactual Consensus via Latent Space Reasoning Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08221](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08221) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.08221) > Abstract:This paper presents NoisyCoconut, a novel inference\-time method that enhances large language model \(LLM\) reliability by manipulating internal representations\. Unlike fine\-tuning methods that require extensive retraining, NoisyCoconut operates directly on model representations during inference and requires no retraining\. Rather than training models to reason in latent space, we inject controlled noise into latent trajectories to generate diverse reasoning paths\. Agreement among these paths provides a confidence signal, enabling models to abstain when uncertain\. We demonstrate that this approach achieves effective coverage\-accuracy tradeoffs across multiple reasoning benchmarks without requiring access to training data or modification of model parameters\. This approach provides a practical pathway to improving the reliability of LLM outputs while maintaining compatibility with existing models\. Our experiments show that unanimous agreement among noise\-perturbed paths reduces error rates from 40\-70% to below 15%, enabling models to exceed 95% accuracy on mathematical reasoning tasks through selective abstention\. ## Submission history From: Michael Jerge \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/c5dad695/2605.08221)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 6 May 2026 13:58:55 UTC \(212 KB\)
Similar Articles
Interpreting Latent CoT Reasoning as Dynamical Systems
This paper applies dynamical systems analysis to interpret latent chain-of-thought reasoning in models like CODI and COCONUT, revealing structured dynamics with stable and unstable classes.
Latent Reward Steering: An Adaptive Inference-Time Framework that Implicitly Promotes Cognitive Behaviors in Reasoning LLMs
Introduces Latent Reward Steering (Lrs), an adaptive inference-time framework that uses sparse autoencoder latent states and a learned reward model to implicitly promote cognitive behaviors like verification and backtracking in reasoning LLMs, improving performance across multiple models and benchmarks.
CoRA: Confidence-Rationale Alignment for Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
This paper introduces CoRA, a GRPO-based reinforcement learning framework that aligns LLM confidence with generated rationales to improve the reliability of chain-of-thought reasoning, achieving up to 26.51% reduction in misalignment error across multiple benchmarks.
The Illusion of Reasoning: Exposing Evasive Data Contamination in LLMs via Zero-CoT Truncation
This paper introduces Zero-CoT Probe (ZCP), a black-box detection method that identifies evasive data contamination in LLMs by truncating chain-of-thought reasoning and comparing performance on perturbed datasets, achieving robust detection of both direct and indirect contamination.
Revisiting Chain-of-Thought Reasoning under Limited Supervision: Semi-supervised Chain-of-Thought Learning
This paper introduces Semi-CoT, a semi-supervised learning framework for chain-of-thought reasoning that uses unlabeled questions with an entropy-based selection to generate reliable pseudo reasoning chains, showing promising but mixed results on math reasoning benchmarks.