IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper introduces IntentGrasp, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' intent understanding capabilities, revealing poor performance across 20 tested models. It proposes Intentional Fine-Tuning (IFT) as a solution, which significantly improves model performance and demonstrates strong cross-domain generalizability.

Accurately understanding the intent behind speech, conversation, and writing is crucial to the development of helpful Large Language Model (LLM) assistants. This paper introduces IntentGrasp, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the intent understanding capability of LLMs. Derived from 49 high-quality, open-licensed corpora spanning 12 diverse domains, IntentGrasp is constructed through source datasets curation, intent label contextualization, and task format unification. IntentGrasp contains a large-scale training set of 262,759 instances and two evaluation sets: an All Set of 12,909 test cases and a more balanced and challenging Gem Set of 470 cases. Extensive evaluations on 20 LLMs across 7 families (including frontier models such as GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.7) demonstrate unsatisfactory performance, with scores below 60% on All Set and below 25% on Gem set. Notably, 17 out of 20 tested models perform worse than a random-guess baseline (15.2%) on Gem Set, while the estimated human performance is ~81.1%, showing substantial room for improvement. To enhance such ability, this paper proposes Intentional Fine-Tuning (IFT), which fine-tunes the models on the training set in IntentGrasp, yielding significant gains of 30+ F1 points on All Set and 20+ points on Gem Set. Tellingly, the leave-one-domain-out (Lodo) experiments further demonstrate the strong cross-domain generalizability of IFT, verifying that it is a promising approach to substantially enhancing the intent understanding of LLMs. Overall, by benchmarking and boosting intent understanding ability, this study sheds light on a promising path towards more intentional, capable, and safe AI assistants for human benefits and social good.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/11/26, 02:43 AM

Paper page - IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.06832

Abstract

IntentGrasp is a benchmark for evaluating large language models’ intent understanding capability, demonstrating poor performance across 20 models and showing significant improvements with intentional fine-tuning.

Accurately understanding the intent behind speech, conversation, and writing is crucial to the development of helpful Large Language Model (LLM) assistants. This paper introduces IntentGrasp, a comprehensivebenchmarkfor evaluating theintent understandingcapability of LLMs. Derived from 49 high-quality, open-licensed corpora spanning 12 diverse domains, IntentGrasp is constructed through source datasets curation, intent label contextualization, and task format unification. IntentGrasp contains a large-scale training set of 262,759 instances and two evaluation sets: an All Set of 12,909 test cases and a more balanced and challenging Gem Set of 470 cases. Extensive evaluations on 20 LLMs across 7 families (including frontier models such as GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.7) demonstrate unsatisfactory performance, with scores below 60% on All Set and below 25% on Gem set. Notably, 17 out of 20 tested models perform worse than a random-guess baseline (15.2%) on Gem Set, while the estimated human performance is ~81.1%, showing substantial room for improvement. To enhance such ability, this paper proposes IntentionalFine-Tuning(IFT), which fine-tunes the models on the training set in IntentGrasp, yielding significant gains of 30+ F1 points on All Set and 20+ points on Gem Set. Tellingly, the leave-one-domain-out (Lodo) experiments further demonstrate the strongcross-domain generalizabilityof IFT, verifying that it is a promising approach to substantially enhancing theintent understandingof LLMs. Overall, bybenchmarking and boostingintent understandingability, this study sheds light on a promising path towards more intentional, capable, and safe AI assistants for human benefits and social good.

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub1Add to collection

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.06832 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper1

#### yuweiyin/IntentGrasp Viewer• Updatedabout 1 hour ago • 276k • 311 • 2

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.06832 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

IPQA: A Benchmark for Core Intent Identification in Personalized Question Answering

arXiv cs.CL

IPQA introduces a benchmark for evaluating core intent identification in personalized question answering, addressing a gap in existing metrics that focus on response quality rather than intent understanding. The paper presents a dataset construction methodology grounded in bounded rationality and demonstrates that state-of-the-art language models struggle with identifying user-prioritized intents from answer selection patterns.

IntentVLA: Short-Horizon Intent Modeling for Aliased Robot Manipulation

Hugging Face Daily Papers

IntentVLA is a history-conditioned visual-language-action framework that improves robot imitation learning stability by encoding short-horizon intents from visual observations, addressing challenges from partial observability and ambiguous observations. It also introduces AliasBench, an ambiguity-aware benchmark for evaluating such methods.

Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models: A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures

arXiv cs.CL

A comprehensive survey reviewing recent advances in intrinsic interpretability for Large Language Models, categorizing approaches into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. The paper addresses the challenge of building transparency directly into model architectures rather than relying on post-hoc explanation methods.