PrefixGuard: From LLM-Agent Traces to Online Failure-Warning Monitors

Hugging Face Daily Papers 论文

摘要

# Paper page - PrefixGuard: From LLM-Agent Traces to Online Failure-Warning Monitors Source: [https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.06455](https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.06455) ## Abstract PrefixGuard enables effective online monitoring of LLM agents through trace analysis and prefix\-based risk scoring, demonstrating strong performance across multiple benchmark tasks while providing diagnostic insights for alert reliability\. Large language model \(LLM\) agents now execute long, tool\-using ta

Large language model (LLM) agents now execute long, tool-using tasks where final outcome checks can arrive too late for intervention. Online warning requires lightweight prefix monitors over heterogeneous traces, but hand-authored event schemas are brittle and deployment-time LLM judging is costly. We introduce PrefixGuard, a trace-to-monitor framework with an offline StepView induction step followed by supervised monitor training. StepView induces deterministic typed-step adapters from raw trace samples, and the monitor learns an event abstraction and prefix-risk scorer from terminal outcomes. Across WebArena, τ^2-Bench, SkillsBench, and TerminalBench, the strongest PrefixGuard monitors reach 0.900/0.710/0.533/0.557 AUPRC. Using the strongest backend within each representation, they improve over raw-text controls by an average of +0.137 AUPRC. LLM judges remain substantially weaker under the same prefix-warning protocol. We also derive an observability ceiling on score-based area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) that separates monitor error from failures lacking evidence in the observed prefix. For finite-state audit, post-hoc deterministic finite automaton (DFA) extraction remains compact on WebArena and τ^2-Bench (29 and 20 states) but expands to 151 and 187 states on SkillsBench and TerminalBench. Finally, first-alert diagnostics show that strong ranking does not imply deployment utility: WebArena ranks well yet fails to support low-false-alarm alerts, whereas τ^2-Bench and TerminalBench retain more actionable early alerts. Together, these results position PrefixGuard as a practical monitor-synthesis recipe with explicit diagnostics for when prefix warnings translate into actionable interventions.
查看原文
查看缓存全文

缓存时间: 2026/05/11 10:44

Paper page - PrefixGuard: From LLM-Agent Traces to Online Failure-Warning Monitors

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.06455

Abstract

PrefixGuard enables effective online monitoring of LLM agents through trace analysis and prefix-based risk scoring, demonstrating strong performance across multiple benchmark tasks while providing diagnostic insights for alert reliability.

Large language model (LLM) agents now execute long, tool-using tasks where final outcome checks can arrive too late for intervention. Online warning requires lightweightprefix monitorsover heterogeneous traces, but hand-authored event schemas are brittle and deployment-time LLM judging is costly. We introduce PrefixGuard, atrace-to-monitor frameworkwith an offlineStepView inductionstep followed by supervised monitor training. StepView induces deterministic typed-step adapters from raw trace samples, and the monitor learns anevent abstractionandprefix-risk scorerfrom terminal outcomes. Across WebArena, τ^2-Bench, SkillsBench, and TerminalBench, the strongest PrefixGuard monitors reach 0.900/0.710/0.533/0.557AUPRC. Using the strongest backend within each representation, they improve over raw-text controls by an average of +0.137AUPRC. LLM judges remain substantially weaker under the same prefix-warning protocol. We also derive an observability ceiling on score-based area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) that separates monitor error from failures lacking evidence in the observed prefix. Forfinite-state audit, post-hocdeterministic finite automaton (DFA)extraction remains compact on WebArena and τ^2-Bench (29 and 20 states) but expands to 151 and 187 states on SkillsBench and TerminalBench. Finally, first-alert diagnostics show that strong ranking does not imply deployment utility: WebArena ranks well yet fails to support low-false-alarm alerts, whereas τ^2-Bench and TerminalBench retain more actionable early alerts. Together, these results position PrefixGuard as a practical monitor-synthesis recipe with explicit diagnostics for when prefix warnings translate into actionable interventions.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub1Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605\.06455

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.06455 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.06455 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.06455 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

相似文章

PropGuard:通过传播感知的探索与修复保障LLM-MAS安全

arXiv cs.LG

PropGuard是一种传播感知框架,用于保护基于LLM的多智能体系统(LLM-MAS)免受跨智能体和轮次传播的恶意指令的影响。它构建了一个双视角时空图,并使用经过GE-GRPO训练的检查器来检测和修复可疑的传播子图。

通过溯源分析防范LLM代理失对齐

arXiv cs.CL

本文提出了一种基于溯源的框架和多阶段流水线\tool,用于在LLM代理执行工具调用前检测失对齐,与基于LLM作为裁判的基线相比,显著降低了错误率。

内存增强型LLM智能体中的状态污染

arXiv cs.AI

本文识别并研究了LLM智能体中的“记忆洗白”现象,即有毒或对抗性上下文被压缩成记忆摘要后,能够逃避标准毒性检测器,同时仍影响后续生成。文章引入了亚阈值传播间隙(SPG)来衡量隐藏的下游影响,并表明在摘要之前对有毒状态进行消毒比事后清理更有效。