Tried running 748B DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on a €2k PC
Summary
A user successfully ran the 748B-parameter DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 model at 7.2 tok/s on a €2k used PC with an RTX 3090, using a 1-bit Unsloth UD-IQ1_S GGUF quantization and a custom llama.cpp build with on-demand Engram table loading.
Similar Articles
@danveloper: I can't believe this works, but I got DeepSeek-V4-Flash (284B params) running on a Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB edition) at >1to…
A developer successfully ran the 284B-parameter DeepSeek-V4-Flash model on a Raspberry Pi 5 at over 1 tok/s, using an untouched GGUF file from antirez after extensive experimentation.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 unsloth gguf on A100
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is shown running as an unsloth GGUF quant on a single 40GB A100, with 17.7 tok/s and 6 experts loaded into VRAM, enabling a full agentic coding loop.
Deepseek V4 Flash running on RTX 5090 MoE
User shares optimization benchmarks for DeepSeek-V4-Flash (Q2_K) running on an RTX 5090 using a fork of llama.cpp, achieving 21.3 tokens/s generation and 1 million context size.
DeepSeek-v4-Flash-Mini 54GB GGUF running at ~20.5 t/s
A community build crushes DeepSeek-V4-Flash down to a 54GB IQ2_XXS GGUF variant with aggressive 2-bit quantization, achieving ~20.5 tokens/s on local hardware while drastically reducing memory footprint.
3 experiments running dsv4-flash-0731 q4+ quants on 128GB RAM + ~60 GB VRAM (with a quite bad pcie infra) with an acceptable tgs and relatively acceptable pp speed
The author conducted experiments to run DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 with 4-bit quantizations on a 128GB RAM system, using optimizations like memory mlocking and prompt processing strategies to achieve acceptable inference speeds.