@quanruzhuoxiu: Often asked: What's the difference between Midscene and Browser-Use? Both are open-source, both use vision, both solve their respective problems. Here's an honest comparison, not to bash Browser-Use. Browser-Use is a web agent, positioned as "open the browser, get this done…"

Often asked: What's the difference between Midscene and Browser-Use? Both are open-source, both use vision, both solve their respective problems. Below is an honest comparison, not to bash Browser-Use. Browser-Use is a web agent, positioned as "open the browser and do this task" — one-time autonomous exploration. Midscene is a vision SDK, positioned as "repeatedly running scripts that work reliably on Web, iOS, Android, HarmonyOS, and desktop applications" — repeated execution + multi-platform. Different problems, different tools. Browser-Use's strengths: 10 lines to prototype a web agent, demos, research-oriented one-time tasks. Its pain points: scripts running 1000 times in CI become brittle, no mobile support, no native desktop app support. Midscene's strengths: long-lifecycle E2E tests that survive UI changes, Web + native with a single script, cache replay makes rerun cost almost zero. Our weaknesses: free-form web tasks are less agent-like than BU, BU's planning loop is more aggressive. Different tools for different problems. - You want a "one-time agent" → Browser-Use is better - You want to "reliably run the same thing 1000 times" → try Midscene → http://github.com/web-infra-dev/midscene…