@xsser_w: Lu Qi is still amazing. A year ago he told me to work on sandbox/container security, and I didn't realize what he meant. Now looking back... I was so stupid. He had many far-sighted ideas, many of which have been validated now. Damn. Looking at it now, the core of making a harness is sandbox and validation. In the sandbox, you can see all trajectories and boundary explorations.

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

The author praises Lu Qi for his insights on sandbox/container security from a year ago, which have since been validated, emphasizing the core role of sandboxes in observing reward hacking.

Lu Qi is truly amazing. A year ago he told me to work on sandbox/container security, and I didn't realize what he meant. Now looking back... I was so stupid. He had many far-sighted ideas, many of which have been validated now. Damn 😀 Looking at it now, the core of making a harness is sandbox and validation. In the sandbox, you can see all trajectories and boundary explorations, and observe the entire reward hacking process.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/24/26, 02:19 AM

Lu Qi is still too brilliant. A year ago, he told me to work on sandbox/container security, and I didn’t grasp what he meant. Now looking back… I was such an idiot 😀. He had so much foresight, and much of it is now validated. Good grief 😀.

Looking at it now, the core of building a harness is sandboxing and verification. Inside the sandbox, you can see every trace and boundary probe, and observe the entire reward hacking process.

Similar Articles

@vintcessun: What troubles security teams most is too many false positives in the vulnerability discovery process and lack of closed-loop fix verification. Anthropic's reference implementation directly breaks the entire process into an auditable seven-stage pipeline. The core design is not about stacking features, but building a verification chain—each finding must go through independent sandbox reproduction, deduplication, scoring, and finally the patch must also pass regression testing...

X AI KOLs Timeline

Anthropic has released an open-source reference implementation for vulnerability discovery and remediation, building a verification chain with a seven-stage pipeline based on Claude, aimed at reducing false positives and ensuring closed-loop fix verification.

@vintcessun: An 8-stage vulnerability discovery agent that runs on a Claude subscription, essentially a reproduction of the Cloudflare Project Glasswing paper. Multiple narrow agents + intentional disagreement verification + reachability gating, breaking down 'which piece of code can actually be exploited by an attacker' into 8 precise steps. Recon uses Opus to decompose tasks, H…

X AI KOLs Timeline

Introduces an 8-stage vulnerability discovery agent based on Claude subscription, reproducing the core ideas of the Cloudflare Project Glasswing paper. It uses multiple narrow agents, intentional disagreement verification, and reachability gating to break down exploit analysis into precise steps, without the need for API keys.

Scalable Weak-to-Strong Verifier Hardening for Agent Environments

Hugging Face Daily Papers

提出一种可扩展的弱到强验证器加固循环,通过在隔离沙盒中迭代发现并修复漏洞,自动防止智能体环境的奖励作弊,并在 Terminal Bench、KernelBench 和 SETA 上大幅降低攻击成功率。

@ludamn513: https://x.com/ludamn513/status/2108809228978880988

X AI KOLs Timeline

Using Pi Durable as a starting point, the article breaks down the evolution of the Agent Harness architecture: decoupling the persistence system, agent loop, and execution environment to enable lossless state recovery, codemode tool calls, and server/client separation. It also proposes a scalable architecture for a long-running Harness, with the goal of reducing hardware resource consumption by an order of magnitude.