@Miles_Brundage: Among other things, we need: - auditing to actually be required at the leading companies, with minimum qualification, i…
Summary
Miles_Brundage advocates for mandatory auditing and enforceable safety standards for leading AI companies to improve oversight and security.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/16/26, 03:57 AM
Among other things, we need:
-
auditing to actually be required at the leading companies, with minimum qualification, independence, access etc. criteria
-
actual safety and security standards, not just “you need to have a [possibly weak] policy and follow it”
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: One of the reasons I decided to go all in on frontier AI auditing after leaving OpenAI is so that, if AI companies need…
Miles Brundage discusses his move to focus on frontier AI auditing after leaving OpenAI, emphasizing that independent auditors can reassure AI companies that their peers are taking costly safety steps. AVERI supports this, advocating for paced development backed by independent oversight.
@Miles_Brundage: I think we need federal AI regulation ASAP - something roughly along the lines of the Obernolte-Trahan but not blocking…
Miles Brundage calls for federal AI regulation with transparency and auditing requirements, noting that being pro-regulation helped a candidate in a primary.
@Miles_Brundage: First frontier AI auditing requirement in the US!
Illinois enacts the strongest AI safety and accountability bill in the US, establishing the first frontier AI auditing requirement in the country.
@Miles_Brundage: - robust whistleblower protections (NDAs discourage people from sharing not-yet-illegal-but-dangerous things with polic…
The article advocates for robust whistleblower protections to address AI risks and emphasizes serious investment in AI alignment and security against AI-enabled state attackers.
@Miles_Brundage: I understand where people are coming from when saying “existing laws already say you can’t do reckless AI stuff!” And y…
Miles Brundage criticizes the effectiveness of existing laws in preventing reckless AI actions, noting that safety and security staff in companies feel unsupported by current legal frameworks.