Masked depth modeling with sensor-validity masking: reports best RMSE on 7 of 8 masked/sparse depth benchmarks, plus a controlled encoder-init study[R]
Summary
This paper proposes masked depth modeling with sensor-validity masking, achieving best RMSE on 7 out of 8 masked/sparse depth benchmarks, with a controlled encoder-init study.
Similar Articles
One Scene, Two Depths: Probing Geometric Ambiguity in Monocular Foundation Models
Introduces MultiDepth-3k, a benchmark to evaluate depth-layer preferences in monocular depth foundation models, and shows Laplacian Visual Prompting can alter reported depth layers, suggesting complementary geometric hypotheses exist across models.
3D Masked Autoencoders are Robust Learners of Volumetric and Multimodal Cellular Representations for Microscopy
This paper presents 3D masked autoencoders for volumetric microscopy data, demonstrating that 3D modeling outperforms 2D max-projection and slice-based variants on downstream single-cell tasks, with cross-modal alignment to a protein language model further improving performance.
Vision Pretraining for Dense Spatial Perception
This paper introduces masked boundary modeling, a self-supervised paradigm for vision pretraining that learns sub-pixel boundary representations to improve dense spatial perception. The resulting model, LingBot-Vision, demonstrates significant improvements in depth estimation and other downstream tasks, showing that boundary modeling is a scalable pretraining principle for spatially structured visual representations.
chenxwh/depth-anything-v2
Depth Anything V2 is a monocular depth estimation model that significantly outperforms V1 in fine-grained details and robustness, offering faster inference and higher accuracy than SD-based models. It is available on Replicate under varying licenses.
@a1zhang: RLM arXiv paper update: depth>1 results, more comparisons, more training, and more error analysis! We add depth=2/3 exp…
This update to the RLM arXiv paper adds depth>1 experiments with recursive RLM calls, showing significant performance gains on OOLONG-Pairs and other benchmarks, along with new comparisons to OpenCode and Claude Code, additional training results on MRCRv2, and an expanded error analysis.