@sama: The world deserves confidence that American companies developing increasingly capable AI will act responsibly, especial…
Summary
Sam Altman emphasizes the need for AI companies to act responsibly and welcomes a federal framework for frontier AI safety, advocating for shared standards and collaboration.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/14/26, 05:58 AM
The world deserves confidence that American companies developing increasingly capable AI will act responsibly, especially as the trajectory of progress has steepened. Every frontier lab must deliver on this, and there is no reason any of us should come to work if we cannot.
We welcome a federal framework that sets consistent safety requirements for frontier AI. But we do not believe we need to wait for an anti-trust exemption or legislation to begin the work of providing this confidence. Consistent rules to manage frontier risk so that we can maximize the benefits are a good idea (and we are excited by ideas like independent auditors).
Years ago, companies like ours developed things like Responsible Scaling Policies and Preparedness Frameworks. Those were good for that moment, and focused primarily on the deployment of completed models, not what happens during their development process.
Today’s shift to focusing on safe development and evaluation will need new tools. For example, at OpenAI we now formulate explicit safety cases in advance of frontier reinforcement learning runs we expect to significantly increase capability, in addition to the safety work we have long done in advance of model releases.
We hope that other companies will learn from our approaches and propose their own; we think shared standards for misalignment, monitoring, and safety will lead to better outcomes. We look forward to collaborating with our colleagues across the industry to formulate the best version of these.
When we talk about “pacing”, we do not mean “stopping”. Progress has been rapid and will continue to be. But it should be slower than it otherwise could be; interventions like safety cases and monitoring have significant costs.
Pacing will be well worth this cost; no amount of American competitive pressure should justify recklessness, or let capabilities get ahead of alignment and monitoring.
Where we will need the help of our government is for international coordination. But first we should do what we can ourselves.
Similar Articles
@sama: theUSshould lead on AI by continuing to develop the very best models, making sure they're safe, and getting cyber tools…
Sam Altman argues that the US should lead in AI by developing the best models, ensuring safety, and providing cyber tools to trusted defenders, praising the new executive order for striking the right balance.
The US is advancing AI safety through state and federal action
OpenAI's Chief Global Affairs Officer discusses how US states like California, New York, and Illinois are advancing frontier AI safety legislation, creating a de facto national standard through 'reverse federalism', and emphasizing the need for democratic oversight in AI governance.
@sama: There are two ways AI progress could go very badly and that we must avoid. First, we could lose control of the future t…
Sam Altman highlights two major risks in AI progress: loss of control and excessive power concentration, stressing the importance of alignment, safety, and responsible AI development by frontier labs.
@sama: i want the US to win in AI both in open source and proprietary models, and i am glad to see this
Sam Altman expresses support for US leadership in AI and agrees with Jensen Huang's letter on the importance of open models.
@antonosika: Warnings like this deserve to be taken seriously. I’m building an AI company because I believe this technology can give…
A European AI founder advocates for taking AI risks seriously and calls for international coordination to ensure safe AI development, while emphasizing investment in research and infrastructure to democratize AI benefits.