MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AI
Summary
This paper introduces MLS-Bench, a benchmark designed to assess whether AI systems can invent generalizable and scalable machine learning methods rather than just performing engineering tuning.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/12/26, 02:49 AM
Paper page - MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AI
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.08678 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Current AI agents struggle to invent generalizable and scalable machine learning methods, relying more on engineering tuning than true method discovery, with performance bottlenecks stemming from scientific insight rather than computational resources.
Modern AI progress has been driven by ML methods that are generalizable across settings and scalable to larger regimes. Aslarge language modelsdemonstrate advanced capabilities in reasoning, coding, and engineering tasks, it is increasingly important to understand whether they can discover such methods rather than only apply existing ones. We introduceMLS-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating whether AI systems can invent generalizable andscalable ML methods.MLS-Benchcontains 140 tasks across 12 domains, each requiring an agent to improve one targeted component of an ML system or algorithm and demonstrate that the improvement generalizes across controlled settings and scales. We find that current agents remain far from reliably surpassing human-designed methods, and thatengineering-style tuningis easier for them than genuinemethod invention. We further study the effects oftest-time scaling,adaptive compute allocation, andcontext provisionon agents’ discovery performance, together with case studies of their behavior. Our analyses suggest that the bottleneck is not only in proposing new methods, but also in thescientific insightneeded to plan, validate, and scale claims about them. More search, compute, or context alone does not remove this bottleneck. We build and maintain a community platform for cumulative andcomparable iteration, and release the data and code at https://mls-bench.com.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub10Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605\.08678
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.08678 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper1
#### Bohan22/MLS-Bench-Tasks Viewer• Updatedabout 10 hours ago • 140 • 42
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.08678 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering
OpenAI introduces MLE-bench, a benchmark of 75 Kaggle ML competitions to evaluate AI agents on real-world ML engineering tasks. The best setup, o1-preview with AIDE scaffolding, achieves at least a Kaggle bronze medal in 16.9% of competitions.
Unsteady Metrics and Benchmarking Cultures of AI Model Builders
This paper introduces Benchmarking-Cultures-25, a dataset analyzing how AI model builders selectively highlight benchmarks in press releases. It finds a fragmented evaluation landscape with limited cross-model comparability, arguing that benchmarks are used as narrative devices for market positioning rather than standardized scientific measurement.
Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos
Artifact-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates multimodal large language models on detecting and analyzing artifacts in AI-generated videos, revealing significant limitations and misalignment with human perception.
BEAMS: Benchmarking and Evaluating AI for Modeling and Simulation
The BEAMS Initiative presents a benchmark suite for evaluating AI tools in modeling and simulation, focusing on human-centered and responsible AI practices. Tests reveal variability across LLM-based engines, with better performance in qualitative tasks than causal reasoning.
SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones?
SoundnessBench is a benchmark of 1,099 machine-learning research proposals that evaluates LLMs' ability to assess methodological validity, finding a pervasive optimism bias in current models.