识别、模拟与拒绝:一项关于LLM智能体中经典心理学效应的污染感知研究

arXiv cs.CL 论文

摘要

本文使用污染感知方法论,研究LLM智能体中经典心理学效应的识别、模拟与拒绝。

arXiv:2609.22090v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An LLM producing the response pattern associated with a human psychological effect is not the same claim as the LLM possessing that bias. We present PsyAgentBench, a benchmark that re-runs classic psychology experiments on LLM agents under a factorial design built to separate these: each paradigm is run with the paradigm explicitly labeled in the prompt (named) or framed as a routine task (blind), and on the literal textbook version of the task (canonical) or a structurally matched variant written to reduce lexical and scenario overlap with likely training data (counterfactual), crossed with a persona manipulation. Across five completed paradigms, evaluated on up to three open-weight model families with 41,904 trials released, apparently human-like effects arise through qualitatively different routes rather than one susceptibility: paradigm-label gating with explicit override (Asch conformity, 0 percent blind to 83.3 percent named on gpt-oss-120B), knowledge-dependent signal reliance (anchoring, exactly zero on grounded facts versus near total on invented quantities, a pattern equally consistent with rational use of the only available signal), amplification on novel content under labeling (framing), robust absence (sunk cost), and safety-mediated selection where refusal itself is the primary finding (minimal-group allocation). A one-sentence persona change (agreeableness, framed as an instruction rather than a verified trait manipulation) eliminates, dampens, or reverses these effects depending on which effect it is, arguing against any single response-bias account. We further formalize, and in two cases document empirically, three ways a psychology paradigm can fail to port to LLM agents: persona dominance, population collapse, and safety selection. We argue scalar bias-susceptibility scores obscure this structure and report replication profiles instead.
查看原文
查看缓存全文

缓存时间: 2026/09/22 08:59

# Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22090](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22090)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

相似文章

内存增强型LLM智能体中的状态污染

arXiv cs.AI

本文识别并研究了LLM智能体中的“记忆洗白”现象,即有毒或对抗性上下文被压缩成记忆摘要后,能够逃避标准毒性检测器,同时仍影响后续生成。文章引入了亚阈值传播间隙(SPG)来衡量隐藏的下游影响,并表明在摘要之前对有毒状态进行消毒比事后清理更有效。

情感如何在LLM智能体间传播:人群模拟中的涌现情感传染

arXiv cs.AI

本文提出了一种多智能体人群模拟,使用LLM驱动的智能体通过视觉、听觉和触觉通道相互感知和评估,导致涌现的情感传染,无需显式手工编写的情感转移。研究展示了在五个场景中空间、时间和人格依赖的传染动态,并评估了后端依赖的评估行为。

LLM智能体使用模拟模型进行受控实验

arXiv cs.AI

本文提出了一种多智能体框架,使LLM智能体能够使用模拟模型为药物过程设计进行受控实验,从而产生比纯语言推理更具体和可操作的建议。