Agent-Editing World Model: Rethinking World Modeling for LLM Agents
Summary
This paper proposes the Agent-Editing World Model (AEWM) to enhance LLM agents by modeling how reasoning and actions shape future task progress, achieving significant performance improvements on benchmarks across domains like search and software engineering.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/25/26, 03:45 AM
Paper page - Agent-Editing World Model: Rethinking World Modeling for LLM Agents
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2609.28416
Abstract
Recentadvancesinlargelanguagemodels(LLMs)haveenabledagentstotacklelong-horizontasksacrossdiverseenvironments.Tofurtherimproveagentperformance,existinglanguageworldmodelstypicallypredictenvironmentobservations,yetreconstructinghigh-entropy,execution-dependenttoolresponsesofferslimitedvaluewhenrealfeedbackisavailable.Meanwhile,agentssufferfromtask-statecontamination,whereunsupportedassumptionsandoutdatedplanspersistinhistoryanddistortsubsequentdecisions.WeproposetheAgent-EditingWorldModel(AEWM),whichmodelshowreasoningandactionsshapefuturetaskprogressratherthansimulatingtoolresponses.AEWMcombinesActionJudgetodistinguishCritical,Exploratory,andNoisydecisionswithStateRevisiontoeditnoisyreasoning--actioncontinuationsfromthesameobservedhistory.EditActintegratesthesecapabilitieswithrealexecution,directlychangingthestateunderlyingsubsequentdecisionsratherthanmerelyprovidingcritiques.WetrainAEWMacrossSearch,Terminal,andSoftwareEngineeringthroughmid-trainingandsupervisedfine-tuning.AEWMachieves70.5\%macro-F1onourActionJudgebenchmark,exceedingthestrongestfrontierbaselineby10.6points.Acrosssixbenchmarksandthreeagentbackbones,EditActimprovesaveragescoresby3.2--6.7pointsoverthestrongestbaseline.Furthermore,rejectionsamplingfine-tuningonverifiedEditActtrajectories,termedAEWM-RFT,improvesoverSelf-RFTby2.2--2.6pointsacrossthreedomainswithoutonlineAEWMguidance.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub3Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609\.28416
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.28416 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.28416 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.28416 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper1
Similar Articles
Bridging the Agent-World Gap: Text World Models for LLM-based Agents
This paper systematically reviews text world models for LLM-based agents, covering foundations, construction paradigms, applications in planning and training, and evaluation methods.
Towards a Belief-Based World Model for LLM Agents
This paper introduces Belief-Based World Models (BB-WMs) to enhance LLM agents' decision-making under partial observability by providing direct access to beliefs about uncertain states, showing improved task performance.
Beyond Next-Observation Prediction: Agent-Authored World Modeling for Sequential Decision Making
This paper introduces Agent-Authored World Modeling (AAWM), a training procedure that constructs world-model supervision based on the policy's own decision needs rather than next-observation prediction, aligning the learning objective with the dynamics required for effective decision-making.
Qwen-AgentWorld: Language World Models for General Agents
Qwen-AgentWorld introduces language world models for agentic environments, covering seven domains with long chain-of-thought reasoning. The work includes a new benchmark, AgentWorldBench, and shows that world modeling improves downstream agent performance.
@dair_ai: Can an LLM agent actually build a model of an environment it cannot see? This work makes the question gradeable. An age…
A research paper proposes agentic automata learning to evaluate whether LLM agents can infer hidden world models through interaction, finding that performance drops sharply as task complexity increases and that reasoning models outperform non-reasoning ones but still struggle.