UK High Court records a non-existent case citation in its 2026 judgment
Summary
The UK High Court's 2026 judgment in [2026] EWHC 2778 (Admin) recorded a non-existent case citation, R v J, attributed to a Senior Crown Prosecutor; The Guardian reports the reference came from an AI-generated response during an internet search, though the court did not find AI caused it.
Similar Articles
Watch These Judges Rip Into Lawyers For Citing Cases That Don't Exist
Judges in a New York appeals court harshly criticized lawyers for using fake, likely AI-generated case citations during oral arguments, highlighting the growing problem of AI misuse in legal proceedings.
Two lawyers just got sanctioned by a federal appeals court for filing AI made up cases
A US federal appeals court sanctioned two lawyers for filing briefs with AI-made-up cases, underscoring the persistent issue of AI hallucinations in legal practice and the necessity of independent citation verification.
Judge Learns Lawyers on Both Sides of Case Used AI, Cancels Trial, Kicks Everyone Off the Case
A Mississippi federal judge cancelled a trial and sanctioned all four lawyers involved after discovering both sides used AI to generate legal filings that contained hallucinated, nonexistent case citations, highlighting the risks of unverified AI use in the legal profession.
Suspecting court of using AI, man injected prompts in filings to try to win case
A man hid AI-readable prompts in court filings to try to influence the court's AI use, but since the court didn't use AI, his attempt failed and he faced sanctions. This case highlights the potential misuse of AI in legal contexts.
Judge relying wholly on AI in order is covered by judicial immunity, court rules
A federal court ruled that a judge's exclusive reliance on AI in issuing a judicial order is covered by judicial immunity, preventing lawsuits in federal court over such actions.