attention-sinks

Tag

Cards List
#attention-sinks

Why don't Graph Transformers attend to the same token?

arXiv cs.LG ↗ · 2026-10-15 Cached

The paper investigates why Graph Transformers rarely form attention sinks compared to LLMs, showing that the attention scoring function — not graph structure — is the main cause: replacing GRIT's gated logit with dot-product attention raises its sink rate from 0.09 to 0.68.

0 favorites 0 likes
#attention-sinks

The Life Cycle of a Massive Activation: Stochastic Birth, Weight-Decay-Driven Growth, and Competitive Consolidation

Hugging Face Daily Papers ↗ · 2026-10-05 Cached

This paper investigates the life cycle of massive activations in transformers, showing that weight decay causally regulates their scale — with an AdamW-preconditioned growth vs. decay balance model predicting peak magnitudes scaling as λ^{-1/2}.

0 favorites 0 likes
#attention-sinks

@hooshaaii: LLMs crash when their KV cache exceeds memory limits. The paper "Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sin…

X AI KOLs Timeline ↗ · 2026-09-24 Cached

The paper introduces StreamingLLM, a framework that uses attention sinks to enable large language models to handle infinite sequence lengths without fine-tuning, improving efficiency in streaming applications.

0 favorites 0 likes
#attention-sinks

[R] All Routes Lead to Collapse: attention sinks, representation collapse, and norm stratification are what content-based routing does under a norm-blind metric

Reddit r/MachineLearning ↗ · 2026-06-25 Cached

This paper demonstrates that attention sinks, representation collapse, and norm stratification are not unique to attention mechanisms but are general consequences of content-based routing under a norm-blind similarity metric, as shown across multiple architectures including transformers, graph attention, state-space models, and recurrent mixers.

0 favorites 0 likes
#attention-sinks

When Graph Tokens Sink: A Mechanistic Analysis of Graph Language Models

Hugging Face Daily Papers ↗ · 2026-06-02

This paper analyzes how large language models internally process graph tokens in Graph Language Models (GLMs), finding a decoupling between activation-level saliency and graph-semantic utility. Graph sink tokens emerge as activation outliers but are not the primary carriers of graph structure, revealing limitations in current graph-token construction and alignment mechanisms.

0 favorites 0 likes
#attention-sinks

A Single Layer to Explain Them All:Understanding Massive Activations in Large Language Models

arXiv cs.CL ↗ · 2026-05-12 Cached

This paper identifies the 'Massive Emergence Layer' where extreme activations in LLMs originate and propagate, proposing a method to mitigate their rigidity and improve model performance on tasks like math reasoning and instruction following.

0 favorites 0 likes
← Back to home

Submit Feedback