Tag
This essay argues that the greatest risk of AI is not hallucinations but the gradual erosion of human verification skills, leading to a civilization that cannot question AI outputs.
A thought piece arguing that as AI becomes more accurate, human oversight may degrade into routine approval, creating a 'Trust–Oversight Paradox' where high-performing AI can still fail due to incomplete representation, stale data, or automation bias, suggesting a shift from human review to governing boundaries.