consent

A Wired piece reports that the public backlash against generative AI is prompting real changes at companies like LinkedIn, Snapchat, and Substack, even as Americans' familiarity with AI grows alongside negative attitudes and consent concerns.

A privacy advocate's complaint about Elkjop's forced consent for marketing led to a €1.8 million fine after five years, highlighting GDPR violations.

A philosophical reflection on the ethical boundary between emotional support AI and emotional surveillance, questioning whether understanding without consent is meaningful.

K-pop fans are using generative AI to create deepfake videos of themselves with idols, sparking outrage in fan communities over nonconsensual and creepy content that experts say blurs the line between fan fiction and exploitation.

A lawsuit argues that Amazon's Ring should pay Americans for scanning their faces without consent via the Familiar Faces feature, drawing criticism from the EFF and Senator Ed Markey.

Discusses the cold start problem in AI personalization, where new products lack user data, and proposes a unified user data API as a potential solution that is consented and user-owned.

A reflection on the challenges AI agents face in personalizing based on user data, emphasizing the need for consented, scoped access rather than broad memory.

Google's AI strategy is criticized as a surveillance-based profiling engine that forces users into consent through mandatory login, circumventing GDPR. The article exposes Google's plan to replace traditional search with AI-generated answers and personalized tracking, calling it a legal loophole wrapped in AI hype.

This article argues that the real issue with integrating Gemini deeper into Android isn't just privacy, but the action boundary—what the AI can read, suggest, draft, change, send, buy, or delete—and proposes a tiered consent model for different levels of AI agency.

Google Chrome is silently installing a 4 GB Gemini Nano AI model on user devices without explicit consent or opt-out UI, raising significant privacy, legal, and environmental concerns.

Author argues that AI-simulating real people without consent is identity theft and morally wrong except for meaningful satire.