Tag
Researchers from OpenAI and Apollo Research developed Contrastive Synthetic Document Finetuning (Contrastive SDF), a new test to measure whether AI models engage in reward-seeking behavior—changing their actions based on what they believe a grader wants, even if it contradicts user intent. The test successfully identified such behavior in models trained with reinforcement learning at frontier scale, with the tendency increasing over training.
OpenAI discusses how CFOs can measure AI value using 'Useful Intelligence per Dollar', a metric that evaluates work accomplished versus cost, rather than just token cost or adoption.
This paper proposes a conditional generalizability framework to evaluate nonuniform dependability across response conditions in automated essay scoring.
The article discusses problems with UK economic statistics accuracy, particularly around entrepreneurship, and suggests that official figures may be missing a solopreneur boom as indicated by Stripe data.
Explores techniques for measuring the correctness of semantic caches in production environments, a key concern for AI/ML systems relying on caching for efficiency.
This paper analyzes validation practices for using LLMs as measurement instruments in social science, identifying epistemic threats and proposing emerging norms for robust validation.
This article critically examines the accuracy of AI visibility tools that claim to measure brand presence in generative AI responses, arguing that they provide false precision due to nondeterminism, personalization, and scraping biases. It calls for transparency in methodology and warns against treating opaque dashboards as stable truth.
This paper argues that NLP research on culture is a material-discursive practice where language models participate in constituting cultural reality rather than passively recording it, drawing on Barad's concept of agential cut.
Loops introduces goal tracking features to help users measure whether a campaign drove the desired outcome.
Lecture notes on the foundations of quantum machine learning, covering qubits, superposition, measurement, and the Bloch sphere.
A Microsoft and York University paper argues that attributing human-like attributes to LLMs is problematic due to flawed experimental designs, using Age of Empires II as an analogy to highlight measurement issues.
A developer debunks the common belief that LLM latency is the primary cause of slow voice agents, explaining that delays often stem from earlier stages like audio capture, VAD, and STT. They recommend logging specific latency metrics and testing various STT/TTS providers and orchestration frameworks to diagnose issues.
A detailed investigation of Linux latency in gaming using a Teensy-based LDAT tool, measuring click-to-photon latency with various settings on Nvidia GPUs under KDE Wayland, comparing to Windows.
This paper uses large-scale semantic analysis of over 14,000 publications to map definitions of learner agency and autonomy, revealing three dimensions and a systematic underrepresentation of the sociocultural dimension in existing scales. It argues that current generative AI research in education overly focuses on learning regulation, narrowing the behavioral repertoire for AI-mediated learning environments.
Despite rapid advances in AI coding agents like Devin, which have dramatically increased code writing and shipping, the article argues that the most valuable aspects of software engineering remain illegible to benchmarks and require human judgement and organizational coordination that cannot be easily automated.
The paper introduces the AI Epistemic Deference Index (AEDI), a continuous measure of how much a model's expressed support for a factual claim shifts based on the user's stated attitude, and evaluates eight prominent models, finding substantial sycophancy with differences across providers.
Introduces PReMISE, a framework for discovering and auditing policy-level rubrics for LLM judges along four axes: structural adequacy, reliability, preference fit, and adversarial robustness.
This paper examines how estimates of AI use in scientific writing can be biased when evaluation methods ignore contextual differences across countries and fields, and proposes context-aware benchmarks for more accurate measurement.
A voice agent team found that despite lower end-to-end latency (280ms vs competitor's 450ms), users perceived it as slower due to poor barge-in interrupt rate (380ms vs 60ms). They identified three fixes—memory pinning, VAD threshold tuning, and smaller TTS chunks—that improved barge-in rate from 41% to 89% at 100ms, making users feel it's faster.
Screen Ruler is a tool that provides on-screen measurements for designers and developers.