Tag
This paper introduces Argus, an agent-based framework for persuasive argument generation that uses Theory-of-Mind to model audience beliefs, integrates rhetorical strategies and knowledge grounding, and demonstrates superior performance over baselines in evaluations.
This paper investigates how rhetorical framing biases AI-based peer review scores, finding that evidence framing and novelty stance have the largest effects and that score movements depend on the reviewer's initial score and evaluation strictness.
This paper investigates how ethos and pathos appeals in social media messages resonate with silent readers, finding that rhetorical content leads to greater interpretive divergence and can predict audience attitudes toward the author.