@jiayuan_jy: The most usage-saving configuration for Codex after testing: - Model 5.6 Sol - Effort: Extra High or Max - Speed: Standard. Ultra is hard to use (just spawns multiple sub agents)
Summary
Share the most usage-saving Codex configuration: Model 5.6 Sol, Effort set to Extra High or Max, Speed set to Standard. Ultra speed is ineffective, Fast consumes too many tokens.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/12/26, 09:02 PM
The most usage-efficient configuration for Codex based on practice:
- Model: 5.6 Sol
- Effort: Choose Extra High or Max
- Speed: Choose Standard
Ultra is hard to use (it just spawns multiple sub-agents), Fast works great but consumes too many tokens. A single task with Ultra + Fast can exhaust the 5h limits.
With this configuration, you can consume 2x-3x more tokens. https://t.co/RdsskIX9o8
Similar Articles
@goan999999: Codex 5.6: The True 90% Efficiency Gap — Master Plan + Steer + Parallel. Do you use Codex by sending a single prompt and waiting? If the direction is wrong, all previous tokens, code, and time are wasted.
This article explains how to boost efficiency with Codex 5.6 using Plan, Steer, and Parallel strategies to prevent resource waste.
@0xluffy_eth: https://x.com/0xluffy_eth/status/2110208191229559267
This article shares how to significantly improve quota efficiency and conserve your subscription allowance by configuring Codex’s subagent models (using GPT-6.1 Sol for the main work and delegating miscellaneous tasks to GPT-6 Luna), dividing responsibilities between scout/fixer subagents, and using AGENTS.md rules and prompt templates.
@Saccc_c: How to give your Codex unlimited bullets? Set the subagent to luna-max. Use sol for complex task design and luna-max for parallel execution. Specific setup: Enter the following prompt in the Codex conversation: In ~/.codex/agents/luna-worke…
Shares a method for customizing a Codex subagent (luna-max) and configuring it as luna-worker, allowing complex tasks to use sol for design and luna-max for parallel execution, resulting in stronger execution capability.
@SUOHA_AI: You must change how you use Codex — the results will be an order of magnitude better. 90% of people treat Codex like a god and go straight to /goal: help me write an app. In reality, it can hardly understand your specific needs. Share a trick used by OpenAI researcher @reach_vb: first let Co…
Share a tip to improve Codex usage: don't set the final goal immediately, but first let Codex do requirements gathering and research, then set a concrete executable /goal based on the findings, which can significantly improve code generation quality.
@geekbb: MCP tool that offloads low-risk tasks from Codex to DeepSeek, letting expensive models only make judgments. Average 48% cost savings over five test tasks with about 6 seconds latency. CodexSaver is an MCP tool that delegates low-risk tasks (writing tests, documentation, code explanations...) in Codex coding sessions...
CodexSaver is an MCP tool that offloads low-risk coding tasks (tests, docs, lint fixes) from Codex to a cheaper model like DeepSeek, achieving ~48% cost savings with ~6s latency.