当无人拥有判断时:人类-AI协作中贡献消解下的责任追究
摘要
本文探讨了在人类-AI协作中,当贡献变得不可区分时,责任归属所面临的挑战,使得判断责任的分配复杂化。
arXiv:2609.29312v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Communities often respond to potentially AI-assisted work by asking three questions: Was AI used? Was that use disclosed? Can hidden use be detected? These questions place AI use itself at the center of accountability while overlooking a deeper problem: unowned judgment. Evaluations, claims, decisions, and creative directions can be shaped by AI with no accountable human or institution prepared to stand behind them. We develop this argument through two illustrative cases: AI-assisted peer review and concealed AI use in creative work. The first shows how contribution dissolution can weaken responsibility while the second shows how the fear of losing credit can discourage honest disclosure. The cases expose the limits of disclosure rules and provenance records as responses to AI-mediated collaboration. We offer three directions for discussion: distinguishing the roles AI plays, identifying judgments that require clear human ownership, and creating conditions in which AI involvement can be disclosed without default penalty. The broader aim is to make AI-shaped contributions discussable, creditable, contestable, and repairable.
查看缓存全文
缓存时间: 2026/09/25 09:46
# When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29312](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29312) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
相似文章
重绘AI地图:智能体生态系统中的责任边界理论
本文引入了责任资产和规则债务,提出了一种关于智能体AI编排器如何影响组织边界的理论,论证了责任约束限制了技术可分解性带来的模块化效应。
认知债务:AI作为智力杠杆与系统性脆弱性动态
本文提出了认知债务的形式化理论,其中使用AI替代第一性原理推理会积累未经核实的义务,导致系统性脆弱性和认知明斯基时刻,表明分散均衡过度采用替代性AI而未考虑外部性。
在人工智能的‘最后一公里’中,人类判断的作用是什么,而模型仍然无法胜任?
作者反思自2019年《Ghost Work》一书出版以来,人类在AI‘最后一公里’中的参与是否发生了转变,探讨人类判断当前的独特角色及其潜在演变。
与AI共行动:基于交互的代理侵权责任框架
本文提出了一种基于交互的框架,用于在代理型AI系统造成损害时分配侵权责任。该框架借鉴了布拉特曼的规划理论和普通法中的共同行动原则,将人机交互类型映射到现有的侵权责任规则上。
如果人工智能利用人类研究的思想解决了千禧年大奖难题,功劳归谁?
本文讨论了人工智能如何通过利用在线发布的人类研究来解决千禧年大奖难题,引发了关于在人工智能与人类协作中功劳归属问题的思考。