When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration
Summary
The paper addresses accountability challenges in human-AI collaboration when contributions become indistinguishable, complicating the assignment of responsibility for judgments.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/25/26, 09:46 AM
# When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29312](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29312) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
Redrawing the AI Map: A Theory of Accountability Boundaries in Agentic Ecosystems
This paper introduces accountability assets and rule debt, proposing a theory of how agentic AI orchestrators affect organizational boundaries, arguing that accountability constraints limit the modularizing effects of technical decomposability.
Cognitive Debt: AI as Intellectual Leverage and the Dynamics of Systemic Fragility
This paper develops a formal theory of cognitive debt, where using AI as a substitute for first-principles reasoning builds up unverified obligations that lead to systemic fragility and a cognitive Minsky moment, showing that decentralized equilibrium over-adopts substitutive AI without accounting for externalities.
What is human judgment doing in AI’s “last mile” that models still can’t?
The author reflects on whether human involvement in AI's 'last mile' has shifted since the 2019 book 'Ghost Work', exploring current unique roles of human judgment and its potential evolution.
Acting with AI: An Interaction-Based Framework for Agentic Tort Liability
This paper proposes an interaction-based framework for allocating tort liability when agentic AI systems cause harm, drawing on Bratman's planning theory and common law concerted action doctrines to map human-AI interaction types onto existing liability rules.
If AI solves a Millennium Prize problem using ideas from human research, who gets the credit?
The article discusses how AI might solve Millennium Prize problems by leveraging human research posted online, raising questions about credit assignment in collaborative AI-human endeavors.