A Reddit user criticizes Artificial Analysis' v5.0 index for having zero open-weight models in its 'Most Attractive' quadrant, noting the chart now favors closed proprietary models over DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi, and Qwen releases.
https://preview.redd.it/dvq3y314o6yh1.png?width=1332&format=png&auto=webp&s=87a0adf5f6329c375b253f4d18f8ebaf2e457e6f I've always actively disagreed with the conspiracy takes when AA reshuffled their index, but v5.0 now has zero open weight models in AA's Most Attractive Quadrant, let alone getting anywhere close to the Pareto line. The old version at least acknowledged DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi, and Qwen were attractive/interesting. I'm ready to ignore AA's index and look at the subsidiary benchmarks. Edit: I screencapped while they were still posting new scores. And it's actually still ongoing. But the pattern holds, no open weights in the Most Attractive Zone. At first I thought I must've filtered it out accidentally, but even in a private window in a different browser the chart is kind of bare for now. Could be AA is waiting on batching updates instead of updating as new scores come in in real time. Here's a link to the chart with all the big boys added in manually: https://artificialanalysis.ai/?models=step-5%2Cinkling%2Cmimo-v2-6-pro%2Cgpt-6-astra%2Cclaude-opus-5-5%2Cmistral-large-4%2Cmuse-spark-open%2Cclaude-fable-5-1%2Cling-3-1-flash-1019%2Cgrok-4-7%2Ckimi-k3-1-pro%2Creflection-beam%2Cgpt-6-luna%2Cclaude-haiku-5-5%2Cgemini-3-8-flash%2Cqwen3-8-27b%2Cgpt-6-1-terra%2Cqwen3-8-max%2Cclaude-sonnet-5-5%2Cgpt-6-1-sol%2Ck2-horizon-375b-a23b%2Cglm-5-3%2Cgemini-4-argon%2Cminimax-m3-1-flash%2Cnemotron-3-5-super-vl%2Cmuse-wonder-full%2Cdeepseek-v4-1-flash-1017%2Cmuse-wonder%2Cclaude-opus-5-5-xhigh%2Cclaude-opus-5-5-high%2Cclaude-opus-5-5-medium%2Cclaude-opus-5-5-low%2Cclaude-fable-5-1-xhigh%2Cclaude-fable-5-1-high%2Cclaude-fable-5-1-medium%2Cclaude-fable-5-1-low%2Cclaude-haiku-5-5-xhigh%2Cclaude-haiku-5-5-high%2Cclaude-haiku-5-5-medium%2Cclaude-haiku-5-5-low%2Cclaude-3-5-haiku%2Cclaude-35-sonnet%2Cclaude-opus-5-xhigh%2Cclaude-opus-5-low%2Cclaude-opus-5-high%2Cclaude-opus-5%2Cclaude-opus-5-medium%2Cclaude-3-7-sonnet-thinking%2Cclaude-3-7-sonnet%2Cclaude-sonnet-5-low%2Cclaude-sonnet-5%2Cclaude-sonnet-5-xhigh%2Cclaude-sonnet-5-high%2Cclaude-sonnet-5-non-reasoning%2Cclaude-sonnet-5-medium%2Cclaude-3-haiku%2Cclaude-opus-4-5-thinking%2Cclaude-opus-4-5%2Cclaude-sonnet-4-6%2Cclaude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive%2Cclaude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort%2Cclaude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning%2Cclaude-opus-4-7%2Cclaude-opus-4-6%2Cclaude-opus-4-6-adaptive%2Cclaude-4-opus%2Cclaude-4-opus-thinking#intelligence-efficiency-tabs
Artificial Analysis intelligence index v5 is drawing criticism for introducing private tests on private datasets that appear to favor closed models like GPT and Google's while significantly downranking open-weight Chinese models such as Kimi 3.1 Pro and DeepSeek 4.1 Flash, coinciding with Google's Carbon 4 topping the index.
An analysis on Artificial Analysis shows that the most attractive quadrant for AI models is already occupied, indicating significant advancements in open-source models.
Z ai's GLM-5.2 has become the new leading open weights model on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, scoring 51 and outperforming competitors like MiniMax-M3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro. The model features 744B total parameters, 40B active, MIT license, and 1M context window.
GLM-5.3-Flash becomes the 3rd strongest open-weight model on AA. It shines even more when the benchmark focuses on complex agentic work. > **Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys):** > Announcing Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3, upgrading Terminal-Bench to 4.0 and adding AutomationBench-AA, an agentic workflow automation benchmark with a private test set. This is a continuation of our rollout of Intelligence Index v5 > > Changelog (Index v4.2 → Index
A critical analysis of Anthropic's stance against open-weights AI models, contrasting it with competitors who have released open models and accusing them of hypocrisy.