@GergelyOrosz: The moment you realize that X >> Threads for anything tech-related in reach / engagement Mark Zuckerberg posted the exa…
Summary
A comparison of engagement on X (Twitter) versus Threads for tech-related content, noting that X appears more active despite Threads claiming higher user numbers.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/10/26, 10:15 PM
The moment you realize that X >> Threads for anything tech-related in reach / engagement
Mark Zuckerberg posted the exact same launch post here and on Threads
(I never understood how Threads claims more users than X. Feels like a tech ghost town there) https://t.co/mRxdC0cHRh
Similar Articles
@Grummz: So X pulls 35 posts at a time and bumps you if you appear more than once. Reading the replies, the most interesting sug…
A discussion thread on X proposes changes to the platform's feed algorithm to reduce multiple posts from the same author dominating a batch, including engagement detection and a 'tweet storm' icon.
@elonmusk: 𝕏
A post claims that X grew its US unique visitors from June 2025 to March 2026, while Threads and Bluesky saw significant drops, contradicting media predictions of X's decline.
Half a billion people are using Threads every month
Threads has surpassed 500 million monthly active users, and Meta is introducing new features like Communities and 'Your Algo' to give users more control over their algorithm.
@koltregaskes: New analytics on X show your "active" followers. Mine is 12.7k out of 19.1k. I don't get this number, it feels like I h…
X has introduced analytics showing 'active' followers; a user shares confusion over the metric.
@BenjaminDEKR: I have 43,600 followers on X. 36% are verified followers (over 15,000) X showed my most recent post to only 780 people,…
User BenjaminDEKR notes that despite having 43,600 followers (36% verified), X showed his most recent post to only 780 people, questioning the platform's algorithm.