Streaming services’ obnoxiously loud ads become illegal on July 1 in California

Ars Technica News

Summary

A California law taking effect July 1 makes excessively loud ads on streaming services illegal, despite industry opposition citing technical challenges with server-side ad insertion and varied playback devices.

<p>On July 1, it will be illegal for streaming platforms to play ads louder than the content being watched in California.</p> <p>As <a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/streaming-ads-quieter-1236630965/">The Hollywood Reporter</a> highlighted this week, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill (<a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB576">SB 576</a>) in October 2025 that prohibits any video streaming service from transmitting the “audio of commercial advertisements louder than the video content the advertisements accompany” in the state.</p> <p>The law brings some parity between streaming services and broadcast, cable, and satellite TV providers, which, under The Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act, can only play commercials at “the same average volume as the programs they accompany,” the <a href="https://www.fcc.gov/enforcement/areas/sound-volume-commercials-calm-act">FCC says</a>.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on-july-1-in-california/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on-july-1-in-california/#comments">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/26/26, 11:21 PM

# Streaming services’ obnoxiously loud ads become illegal on July 1 in California Source: [https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on-july-1-in-california/](https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on-july-1-in-california/) The Motion Picture Association, which includes Netflix, Disney, Amazon Prime Video, and Paramount, and the Streaming Innovation Alliance, which includes Netflix, Disney, Peacock, and Pluto TV, opposed the bill\. The groups argued that “many” streaming services were already trying to manage the “loudness of advertisements that come from server\-side ad insertion that may be inconsistent with the loudness of the programs,” per a state Assembly analysis[\(PDF\)](https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Senate-Floor-Analysis.pdf)from September 2025\. Server\-side ads can have differing volumes due to companies using various encoding pipelines\. Additionally, as the opposing groups previously pointed out, streaming services must contend with a broad range of output devices, including TVs, tablets, and phones\. Reporting on how streaming services might follow the California law, trade publication[TV Tech](https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinion/california-streaming)in December reported: “Streaming providers will need to integrate file\-based and, in some cases, real\-time processing and loudness control into their server\-side commercial insertion workflow, just as they currently do for their primary programming\.” The obstacles in managing the loudness of ads are underscored when considering the dissatisfaction that remains among broadcast, cable, and satellite viewers\. The FCC said it received “at least”[1,700 complaints](https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/02/commercials-are-still-too-loud-say-thousands-of-recent-fcc-complaints/)about this in 2024, about 825 in 2023, and approximately 750 in 2022\.

Similar Articles

Ad-free streaming is a luxury now

The Verge

The article traces the streaming industry's transition from ad-free to ad-supported models due to profitability challenges, with major services like Netflix, Disney Plus, and Amazon Prime Video now offering cheaper ad tiers while raising prices for ad-free access.

California AB 2047 makes 3d printers off-limits to students, educators, business

Hacker News Top

California AB 2047 would require 3D printers sold in the state to include a government-certified detection algorithm, effectively banning them from schools, libraries, and small businesses. The 3D printing industry strongly opposes the bill, arguing the required technology is impossible and would violate the First Amendment.