@Miles_Brundage: I'm all for the government taking cyber risks seriously. But we need a real, unclassified framework for this stuff and …
Summary
Miles Brundage argues for a real, unclassified framework for government cyber risk management, criticizing the current laissez-faire approach.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/25/26, 09:27 PM
I’m all for the government taking cyber risks seriously.
But we need a real, unclassified framework for this stuff and need to stop pretending we’re in laissez-faire world, which increases the risk of abuse, creates market uncertainty, and leads to lower quality decisions
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: I think we need federal AI regulation ASAP - something roughly along the lines of the Obernolte-Trahan but not blocking…
Miles Brundage calls for federal AI regulation with transparency and auditing requirements, noting that being pro-regulation helped a candidate in a primary.
@Miles_Brundage: We could have this at home, American friends (a government agency that is staffed to do, and allowed to publish, stuff …
Miles Brundage highlights excellent work from the AI Security Institute investigating the impact of test-time compute budgets for frontier AI model evaluations, with praise from Noam Brown.
@Miles_Brundage: I'm glad to see conservative groups more engaged on AI safety lately in sometimes helpful ways, but I don't think this …
Miles Brundage comments on a policy position from conservative groups urging Trump to vet AI before release.
@Miles_Brundage: https://x.com/Miles_Brundage/status/2077754759206060370
Miles Brundage shares his speech from the Global Nobel Laureates Assembly on AI and Nuclear War, emphasizing that speed and competition could lead to loss of control over AI despite intentions. He argues for urgent regulation and employee involvement to prevent overly weak frameworks.
@Miles_Brundage: Still lots of alpha in not being at the top few companies - we need independent takes on this stuff now more than ever
Miles Brundage echoes Nathan Lambert's point about the need for independent voices in AI discussions, particularly regarding regulatory capture and attacks on open-source, highlighting the value of not being tied to major AI companies.