Do Coding Agents Need Executable World Models, Simplification, and Verification to Solve ARC-AGI-3?

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This paper investigates whether coding agents require executable world models, simplification, and verification to solve the ARC-AGI-3 benchmark, contributing to research on AGI and reasoning.

arXiv:2607.15439v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Our previous ARC-AGI-3 agent bundled executable world modeling, scheduled simplification, and exact replay verification, leaving unclear which idea accounted for its performance. We address this attribution question with four nested Codex-based agents: a textual baseline; a flexible-interface executable world model without replay verification; the same executable model with scheduled simplification; and a fixed-interface verification treatment that retains simplification and requires exact reproduction of recorded observations. The main study evaluates all four agents with gpt-5.4 and gpt-5.5 at high and xhigh reasoning effort on the public ARC-AGI-3 games. Exploratory follow-ups evaluate the textual and verification variants with gpt-5.6-sol at xhigh and max. The most robust result is that every agent variant improves with a stronger model and with greater reasoning effort. Within each model-effort setting, differences among variants are smaller than anticipated, while the effects of individual components vary across settings. Requiring a persistent executable deliverable is not universally beneficial: the textual variant outperforms the flexible-interface executable variant in both gpt-5.5 settings. Simplification improves performance in three of the four model-effort settings, with the weakest setting as the only exception. The complete verification treatment ranks first in all four settings, although it uses substantially more resources. In the gpt-5.6-sol follow-up, the verification variant fully solves every public game at both reasoning efforts, achieves about 99% RHAE, and uses fewer than half the total actions of the human baseline. Because the model postdates these games and held-out performance remains untested, this result should be interpreted as saturation of the public set only.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/20/26, 09:21 AM

# Do Coding Agents Need Executable World Models, Simplification, and Verification to Solve ARC-AGI-3?
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15439](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15439)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

Coding Agent Is Good As World Simulator

arXiv cs.AI

This paper presents an agentic framework that uses coding agents to generate physically plausible world simulations from natural language prompts, outperforming video-based models in physical accuracy and instruction fidelity.

The Verification Horizon: No Silver Bullet for Coding Agent Rewards

Hugging Face Daily Papers

This paper explores the challenges of verifying AI coding agents' outputs, arguing that verification is becoming harder than generation as models improve. It analyzes four reward constructions and shows that no fixed reward function remains effective as model capability grows.