@VincentLogic: Just tried using Claude Code in Codex, and it feels like opening the door to a new world. This workflow is interesting, and the collaboration between the two is quite smooth. Has anyone else tried this approach?

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

A user shared their experience with a workflow using Claude Code within GitHub Copilot (Codex), noting that the integration between the two is very seamless.

Just tried using Claude Code in Codex, and it feels like opening the door to a new world 🚪 This workflow is interesting, and the collaboration between the two is quite smooth. Has anyone else tried this approach? https://t.co/qpCTr96uA7
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/13/26, 06:46 AM

Just tried using Claude Code inside Codex, and it feels like it opens a whole new world 🚪

This workflow is pretty interesting—the two complement each other smoothly. Has anyone else tried this setup? https://t.co/qpCTr96uA7

Similar Articles

@ai_super_niko: 1/5 Use Claude Code to write code, switch to Codex for review, then switch back to fix. Every switch is a murder of your train of thought. You're not writing code, you're running yourself ragged. Until OpenAI released an official plugin for their competitor Claude Code: `code…

X AI KOLs Timeline

OpenAI launched an official plugin codex-plugin-cc for their competitor Claude Code, used to integrate Codex into Claude Code for code review, sparking discussion about workflow switching efficiency.

@uniswap12: I'm truly impressed by how far Claude Code can be used. Matt Van Horn recently wrote a long article revealing all his tips and workflows for using Claude Code. This article sparked considerable discussion in the developer community because what he showed goes far beyond 'using AI...'

X AI KOLs Timeline

Matt Van Horn shares advanced workflows for using Claude Code: first plan in detail via plan.md, then use voice input and multi-window parallel execution, demonstrating how to deeply integrate AI into the development process, greatly improving efficiency.

@alin_zone: Claude Code and Codex, stop choosing between them. Instead of agonizing over which to use, let them divide the work—one writes, one reviews. Working together is smoother than using either alone. This post covers my own workflow: Claude Code handles writing, Codex handles reviewing. The entire collaboration takes about five steps, and you make the final call.

X AI KOLs Timeline

Introduces a workflow: using Claude Code for writing code and Codex for code review. The two complement each other more efficiently than using either alone. The entire process takes about five steps, with the final decision left to the developer.