what's the actual value of together/fireworks/deepinfra?
Summary
The article questions the value of AI inference providers like Together, Fireworks, and DeepInfra, observing that teams often switch to cheaper models within major APIs rather than moving to open models when costs increase.
Similar Articles
OpenAI/Anthropic’s combined valuation of roughly $1.8 trillion assumes they will continue owning the most valuable intelligence. open weight models will become equally capable, their proprietary weights lose scarcity, API prices collapse, and their valuations plummet. People will start cycling out.
The article argues that as open weight models become equally capable to proprietary ones, OpenAI and Anthropic's valuations will plummet, while companies like Fireworks AI will capture value by operating open models as a neutral infrastructure layer.
AI's Plummeting Prices Are a Software Story, Not a Hardware One (14 minute read)
The article argues that the rapid decrease in AI inference costs is driven by software optimizations rather than hardware improvements, and that open-weight models running on consumer GPUs are becoming increasingly competitive with frontier models.
Something is changing in the unit economics of software
Analyzes how AI inference costs are eroding software's traditional high-margin economics, forcing founders to choose between product quality and unit profitability.
Once all the discounts disappear, how much are you willing to pay for AI?
The article speculates on future AI pricing after discounts disappear, arguing that as AI reaches human-expert quality, the real consideration becomes the value of users' time.
Five Chinese AI labs cut token prices up to 99%
Five Chinese AI labs cut inference token prices by up to 99% in a price war, making frontier inference nearly free and shifting the competitive advantage from models to distribution and tooling.