@Voxyz_ai: >hooked up a shared brain across hermes and openclaw. >agents write decisions every day into it. tokens, junk, raw logs…
Summary
Details a method for connecting AI agents (e.g., Hermes and OpenClaw) to a shared brain that stores decisions and logs, enabling agents to search and reuse past context rather than starting from scratch.
Similar Articles
@akshay_pachaar: the three-tier memory of Hermes agent. AI agents forgets everything when your session ends. Hermes doesn't. it has thre…
Hermes agent's three-tier memory system combines tiny always-present markdown files, full-text SQLite+FTS5 session search, and pluggable external providers to give AI agents persistent, curated memory that composes on every turn.
@gregisenberg: how to set up hermes agent step by step. built-in memory, 40+ tools, works on your phone, and what to think of hermes v…
Hermes is a personal AI agent that runs in the terminal, featuring built-in memory and 40+ tools, with mobile support and comparisons to OpenClaw.
@dr_cintas: You can now give Hermes, Claude Code, and Codex infinite memory It's called agentmemory. Records what your agent does d…
Agentmemory is a free, open-source tool that gives AI agents like Hermes, Claude Code, and Codex infinite memory by recording session activity, compressing it with AI, and injecting relevant context into future sessions. It has over 4,000 GitHub stars.
Hermes vs openclaw: 5 real differences that change which one you should pick
This article compares Hermes and Openclaw AI agents across five key dimensions: self-improvement, community skills, multi-channel support, memory architecture, and framework portability on Clawdi. It concludes that the choice depends on whether users prioritize long-term personalization or immediate multi-channel automation coverage.
@atomicbot_ai: Hermes Agent vs OpenClaw using Qwen 35B Local Model We asked agents to scrape GitHub star history for both tools, find …
A comparison of Hermes Agent and OpenClaw using Qwen 35B local model, where the agents scrape GitHub star history, identify growth spikes, and build live dashboards. OpenClaw took 12m 01s (203k tokens), Hermes took 33m 01s (257k tokens), with different approaches.