What mechanisms are you using to distinguish "agent busy" from "task completed"?
Summary
This article discusses an anti-pattern in AI agent systems where agents appear busy but fail to complete tasks. The author suggests separating responsibilities and requiring proof of completion as a solution.
Similar Articles
How are you actually handling done-verification, stall detection and hard limits on agent runs?
The article discusses practical challenges in running AI agents unattended, such as verifying completion, detecting stalls, and setting hard limits, and seeks advice on effective frameworks or custom solutions.
what actually stops an unattended agent from looping, overspending, or saying "done" when it isn't?
This post discusses common challenges with unattended AI agents, such as looping, overspending, and incorrect task completion, and asks how practitioners handle issues like verification, stall detection, and hard limits in production.
When an AI agent says “done” how do you know it actually happened? [P]
The article explores an early concept called agentuptime, which addresses verifying AI agent actions by independently checking outcomes to ensure that an agent's completion claim matches the actual state of external systems.
How do you handle the 'verification gap' when an agent completes a long-running task?
Discusses the difficulty of verifying outputs from autonomous agents after long-running tasks and asks about using critic agents or traceability tools to ensure trustworthiness.
Agent followup and verification issues
A user describes the problem of AI agents not reporting back after being given tasks and asks the community for solutions and handling methods.