@kentcdodds: I used Fable and Grok 4.5 (in two separate chats) to go find all the hilariously bad AI-generated code in my codebase a…
Summary
The author recounts using Fable and Grok 4.5 to identify and remove poor AI-generated code from their codebase.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/11/26, 09:25 AM
I used Fable and Grok 4.5 (in two separate chats) to go find all the hilariously bad AI-generated code in my codebase and clean it up.
Check mate “read the code”-ers
Similar Articles
Artificial adventures
The author shares their experience using various AI coding assistants (Claude Code, Codex, Pi) for code review and refactoring, finding frontier models surprisingly effective at catching subtle bugs but noting the lower quality and erratic behavior of some tools.
@elonmusk: Grok
Elon Musk shares a workflow using Grok 4.5 for various development tasks, along with Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol, highlighting a real-time research and coding setup.
@Xudong07452910: The best AI coding workflow might be to let AI gradually solidify its instability into a system. The author developed a source code management system for the LLM era using Fable, and the experience is very real: the model is smart, can read large amounts of code, raise issues, and fix problems, but it also makes very low-level mistakes, such as committing the build/ directory twice…
A blog post discusses the need to complement brilliant but clumsy LLMs with deterministic tools and formal workflows, using the author's experience developing the Beagle SCM with Fable as an example.
grok is surprisingly good as a terminal coding agent
Grok, xAI's model, proves surprisingly effective when used as a coding agent directly in a terminal.
@alphabatcher: 540,000 lines of Rails is a brutal way to learn the agent era Garry's List shipped with: > 262,000 lines of app code > …
A critique of large Rails codebases in the AI agent era, proposing a shift to skill-based development with agents, markdown skills, and TypeScript for deterministic I/O.