The smallest voice-agent test I like: make it ask the missing question
Summary
A simple test for voice agents: give an underspecified instruction (like 'use the address on file') and see if the agent asks for clarification before committing. The quality of the follow-up question reveals the agent's reliability.
Similar Articles
My voice agent sounded smart until one phone number was transcribed wrong.
The article argues that voice agent STT should be evaluated on entity accuracy (e.g., phone numbers, dates) rather than general word error rate, because missing critical fields can break workflows. It mentions testing with HubSpot fields and notes Smallest AI Pulse as an interesting tool for capturing workflow-critical entities in real time.
Need honest suggestions on improving my AI Voice Agent
The developer of DeskGreet, an AI receptionist for small businesses, asks for honest feedback on its naturalness, usability, and pricing.
My voice-agent test now includes the 600-second cliff
The author describes a voice agent call cut off at 600 seconds without warning, and proposes a testing approach to handle max duration gracefully, including pre-cutoff warnings and state preservation.
8 months running a voice agent in production: what broke, what fixed it, and the system prompt I use
A practitioner shares 8 months of experience running a voice agent for a law firm, detailing challenges like latency, turn-taking, and post-call workflows, and provides a working system prompt.
Your voice agent can't catch its own over-promises. That's a structural problem, not a tuning one.
The article identifies a structural flaw in voice agents where they cannot detect when they over-promise across multiple conversation turns, and describes building a deterministic checker that flags contradictions without relying on LLM evaluation.