Feel like I'm becoming the glue between many AI tools
Summary
A PM at a mid-size startup shares the frustration of having to manually transfer context between multiple AI tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Perplexity, Notion AI, Atoms AI), feeling like the glue that holds them together rather than being replaced by them.
Similar Articles
How to maintain consistent context across ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI tools
The article discusses the challenge of maintaining consistent context across multiple AI models like ChatGPT and Claude, presenting three common approaches: manual context passing, using one primary model, and a unified workspace, recommending a hybrid approach anchored to a single source of truth.
Tried 16 AI Tools Recently, Here’s What’s Actually Useful
A user shares honest impressions of 16 AI tools, highlighting ChatGPT, Cursor, and Claude as most useful for daily workflow while others are situational.
I built a tool to store all my ai context, personas, and skills in the same place and access it from any ai tool I use. Would anyone use it?
A developer built a cloud-based context layer for AI that stores personas, knowledge, and skills, accessible via MCP across multiple AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, improving reusability and collaboration.
@jerryjliu0: the biggest issue with trying to use all these personal assistants is having to reimport all of my context every time s…
A user highlights the challenge of reimporting context when switching between AI personal assistants like Codex, Claude, and Grok, expressing a desire for a unified solution.
Do you find yourself genuinely building skills with AI assistance, or do you notice your baseline abilities getting softer over time because you reach for the tool first?
Reflection on whether using AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude genuinely builds skills or erodes baseline abilities due to over-reliance on shortcuts, comparing the phenomenon to calculators and search engines.