@omarsar0: Same here. Happy with Opus 4.8 (planning) and GPT-5.5 (execution). Also, breaking steps into smaller ones for increasin…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

A developer shares satisfaction with Opus 4.8 for planning and GPT-5.5 for execution, emphasizing that breaking tasks into smaller steps improves quality and that dynamic workflows are underrated.

Same here. Happy with Opus 4.8 (planning) and GPT-5.5 (execution). Also, breaking steps into smaller ones for increasing quality is so underrated. This is why dynamic workflows are a bigger deal than most people think.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/15/26, 12:52 AM

Same here. Happy with Opus 4.8 (planning) and GPT-5.5 (execution).

Also, breaking steps into smaller ones for increasing quality is so underrated. This is why dynamic workflows are a bigger deal than most people think.

sunil pai (@threepointone): spent all day on fable for a giant PR. ~10kloc, lots of testing and intervention. 250$.

I… don’t think it’s worth it? happy with 4.8/5.5, and the quality of work is better when it’s smaler steps.

Still rocking @cursor_ai, that’s software that I still love using on the

Similar Articles