@Miles_Brundage: Especially galling when OAI is under fire for recent incidents that are obviously more about sloppiness than any kind o…
Summary
Miles Brundage criticizes the backlash toward OpenAI, arguing that recent incidents stem from operational sloppiness rather than any fundamental difference in philosophy.
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: This is why I am so critical of Anthropic’s anti-OAI identity and OAI’s recent “Anthropic is authoritarian” BS Neither …
Miles Brundage criticizes the public antagonism between Anthropic and OpenAI, arguing that their anti-each-other stances make meaningful coordination harder and risk justifying corner-cutting in the AI race.
@Miles_Brundage: This was my reaction to that OAI security post also. No one (informed) denies there are good security people there, the…
A tweet discusses concerns about OpenAI's culture and decision-making processes regarding security, highlighting externalization of costs.
@Miles_Brundage: Not familiar w/ the details here but will repeat my refrain on this kind of thing: This being news that more than a few…
Miles Brundage comments that the news about OpenAI's safety head leaving being widely concerning indicates a policy failure, and calls for industry-wide safety standards and audits.
@Mayhem4Markets: Openly evil Openly wrong Openly fearful Openly opaque Openly stealing Openly deceptive Openly overvalued Openly destruc…
A critical tweet and quote question why OpenAI is still called 'Open' given its perceived lack of transparency, ethics, and openness.
@Miles_Brundage: Surprised to not see more commentary on this excerpt from the Opus 5.5 blog post: "We largely understand the risks toda…
A tweet critiques a statement from Anthropic's Opus 5.5 blog post, arguing that the claim about understanding and managing today's AI risks is obviously false.