What AstroPT knows about galaxies, and what that can teach us about LLMs
Summary
This paper proposes using AstroPT, a transformer trained on galaxy images, as a testbed for studying concept emergence during training, finding that galaxy properties emerge in a fixed difficulty-based sequence, which can inform mechanistic interpretability methods for large language models.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/26/26, 03:18 AM
Paper page - What AstroPT knows about galaxies, and what that can teach us about LLMs
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.22614
Abstract
Using a galaxy-image transformer with known physical concept ordering, the study shows that linear probes recover real structure and that concepts emerge in a fixed difficulty-based sequence during training.
Interpretability research increasingly asks when concepts emerge during training and whetherlinear probesrecover real structure, but in language models these claims are hard to validate because language offers little ground-truth ordering of concepts or relationships among them. We propose the use of astronomical ground truth throughAstroPT, a transformer trained on millions of galaxy images, as a calibration testbed.AstroPTis an LLM-like model trained within a domain where the difficulty ordering of concepts and the relations among them are known in advance. Probingfrozen representationsacrosscheckpoints, layers, model sizes, and objective choices, we find thatgalaxy propertiesemerge in a fixed order that tracks their known difficulty---quantities written almost directly into the pixels (band magnitude) become decodable early in training and shallow in the network, while multiband/spectra based and inferred quantities (such asredshiftandspecific star formation rate) emerge later and deeper. This order is invariant to our tested training objectives, and scales in magnitude but not in sequence with capacity. Our linear probe directions further recover the known physical structure amonggalaxy properties. Our findings suggest that astronomy offers a controlled sandbox for calibratingmechanistic interpretabilitymethods we otherwise apply to LLMs blind.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608\.22614
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22614 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22614 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22614 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
@songhan_mit: Explore lightening OPD for efficient LLM post training:
The article introduces a method to lighten OPD for efficient post-training of Large Language Models.
Understanding Large Language Models
This chapter reviews current understanding of Large Language Models, discussing their Transformer architecture, emergent capabilities resembling human cognition, and debates about whether LLMs genuinely understand or merely simulate understanding.
@v0xium: I strongly recommend reading the Transformer chapter from Speech and Language Processing by Dan Jurafsky and James H. M…
Recommends the Transformer chapter from the freely available book Speech and Language Processing by Dan Jurafsky and James H. Martin, a top resource for understanding the mathematics behind LLMs, and includes a quoted explanation of LLM pre-training.
LLMs with in-context learning for Algorithmic Theoretical Physics
This paper investigates using Large Language Models, specifically Claude, interfaced with a Computer Algebra System (Maple) to perform algorithmic computations in theoretical physics, such as analyzing cosmological perturbations.
Geo-Spatial Concept Probing of Large Language Models: Abstraction, Compositionality, and Grounding
This paper introduces a concept-centric benchmark to probe LLMs' understanding of geo-spatial concepts like direction, distance, and topology, testing abstraction, compositionality, and grounding across various model architectures and scales. Findings reveal clear limitations in current LLMs' conceptual understanding.