For those building AI agents: what would you actually want an agent to do for you?
Summary
The author, working in conversational AI and AI agents, asks builders and users what specific tasks they would want an AI agent to handle in their businesses, emphasizing the value of agents that excel at solving single painful problems.
Similar Articles
After building AI agents for a year, I've started believing most businesses don't actually want agents.
After a year of building AI agents, the author argues that businesses don't actually want autonomous agents—they want specific outcomes like reduced support tickets and manual work, and simpler, reliable solutions often deliver more value than highly autonomous systems.
How to create an ai agent that actually does something useful, not just a demo?
The article discusses the gap between impressive AI agent demos and real-world deployment, focusing on practical challenges in business processes like sales ops, and calls for production case studies.
Stop building AI agents.
The author argues that most founders requesting AI agents actually need straightforward automations with minimal LLM integration, citing production failures, compliance hurdles, and higher ROI from simpler workflows. The piece provides a practical decision framework to help builders and founders prioritize reliable automations over complex, unpredictable agents.
What's your agent actually for? Not coding related.
The author asks the community for examples of AI agents used outside of coding, sharing personal use cases like family dinner negotiations and background research, and invites others to describe their narrow specialist agents.
What's the most useful AI agent you've seen in production?
A discussion about the most useful AI agents actually deployed in production, highlighting simple, single-problem solutions like lead qualification and support triage.