Evaluating Personal Information Output from Conversational Interactions in Generative AI Systems
Summary
This exploratory pilot study evaluates personal information output from conversational interactions in generative AI systems, finding limited impact from model design differences and suggesting inferred profiles are constructed from contextual information.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/22/26, 09:07 AM
# Evaluating Personal Information Output from Conversational Interactions in Generative AI Systems Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22204](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22204) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.22204) > Abstract:This exploratory pilot study evaluates the scope and perceived accuracy of personal information output from ongoing conversational interactions in generative AI systems using GPT\-5\.2 Instant and GPT\-5\.2 Thinking, categorized into three output types: Fact, Inference, and Confidence\. Based on the evaluation results obtained from 15 Japanese participants, differences in model design have limited impact on personal information output tendencies\. Compared with the Inference type, the Fact type shows a more conservative output pattern\. Regarding attribute categories, the findings indicate that Core Personal attributes associated with identification are treated relatively conservatively, whereas Behavioral and Linguistic attributes show higher accuracy across both Fact and Inference outputs\. Furthermore, Holistic Profile, Psychological and Cognitive, and Residual attributes are more readily inferred, even when not supported by explicit factual outputs\. Notably, the lack of null outputs for these attributes in the Inference type suggests that such inferred profiles may be constructed from indirectly available contextual information\. The findings may contribute to future discussions regarding privacy awareness and personal information inference in generative AI systems\. ## Submission history From: Yosuke Seki \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/5eeb695d/2609.22204)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 1 Sep 2026 04:42:07 UTC \(866 KB\)
Similar Articles
Creating and Evaluating Personas Using Generative AI: A Scoping Review of 81 Articles
This scoping review analyzes 81 articles (2022-2025) examining the use of generative AI for creating and evaluating user personas, identifying strengths in reproducibility but critical issues including lack of evaluation in 45% of studies, over-reliance on GPT models (86%), and risks of circularity where the same model generates and evaluates personas.
are ai products getting personalization wrong by relying mostly on chat history?
The article questions whether AI products over-rely on chat history for personalization, noting its noisiness and suggesting that summaries, tags, and preference fields have shortcomings. It seeks alternative sources of truth for context without becoming intrusive.
Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Motivational Interviewing: A Scoping Review From System Design to Intervention Outcomes
A scoping review of generative AI chatbots for motivational interviewing reveals they provide MI-consistent interactions with favorable user perceptions, but evidence for sustained behavioral change is limited.
Study: Generative AI succumbs to conversational misinformed pressure and argument
A study published in Scientific Reports evaluates seven large language models for their vulnerability to misinformation in multi-turn conversations, finding varying levels of susceptibility and correction capabilities among models like ChatGPT and Claude.
Can LLMs Infer Conversational Agent Users' Personality Traits from Chat History?
ETH Zurich researchers show that fine-tuned RoBERTa models can infer users’ Big-Five personality traits from ChatGPT chat logs with up to 44 % above-random accuracy, highlighting privacy risks of conversational AI.