@rohanpaul_ai: New Oxford and Google DeepMind paper finds most workers value jobs beyond pay, so basic income alone may not offset AI …

X AI KOLs Timeline Papers

Summary

牛津与Google DeepMind合作的新论文调研了英美丹印四国8,234名劳动者,发现多数人工作不仅为了薪酬,约20%的人即使获得120%工资的保障收入仍会继续工作,表明仅靠基本收入无法抵消AI带来的失业冲击,AI转型计划还需保障工作的意义、社区与尊严。

New Oxford and Google DeepMind paper finds most workers value jobs beyond pay, so basic income alone may not offset AI job losses. So plans for the AI transition should protect purpose, community, and dignity at work as well as income. finds that about 75% of workers would quit if guaranteed 100% of their wage, yet 1 in 5 would refuse even 120%. If AI automates many jobs, a common plan is a basic income that replaces lost wages. That plan works only if people work mainly for the money. The author surveyed 8,234 working-age adults in the UK, US, Denmark, and India. Workers were sorted by what they value most in their job and asked what guaranteed income would make them quit. Only 26% of classified workers valued their job mainly for pay, while one third valued the work itself. 20% would keep working even if offered 120% of their salary as guaranteed income, a share similar across income levels.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 11/01/26, 07:47 AM

New Oxford and Google DeepMind paper finds most workers value jobs beyond pay, so basic income alone may not offset AI job losses.

So plans for the AI transition should protect purpose, community, and dignity at work as well as income.

finds that about 75% of workers would quit if guaranteed 100% of their wage, yet 1 in 5 would refuse even 120%.

If AI automates many jobs, a common plan is a basic income that replaces lost wages. That plan works only if people work mainly for the money.

The author surveyed 8,234 working-age adults in the UK, US, Denmark, and India. Workers were sorted by what they value most in their job and asked what guaranteed income would make them quit.

Only 26% of classified workers valued their job mainly for pay, while one third valued the work itself. 20% would keep working even if offered 120% of their salary as guaranteed income, a share similar across income levels.

Similar Articles

AI for what?? (ppl like working w/ ppl!)

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

The article criticizes the business model of AI companies that replace middle managers with AI, noting that licensing fees could match employee salaries and that humans inherently need interpersonal interaction, making large-scale replacement unrealistic.